Beyond the Skin: Assessing Itch in Atopic Dermatitis – Insights from UK Dermatologists. A Cross-Sectional Survey and Narrative Review

BACKGROUND: Chronic itch is the most burdensome symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD), yet its routine assessment and measurement remain inconsistent. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterise current practices for evaluating itch in AD among UK dermatologists and, through a narrative review, to summarise available itch assessment tools and inform practical recommendations for routine practice. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional clinician survey and narrative literature review. A total of 394 dermatologists participated in the survey of itch and its assessment in AD during the 2024 British Association of Dermatologists Annual Meeting. RESULTS: Dermatologists reported itch as the most bothersome symptom in atopic dermatitis (78.68%, n = 310), and nearly half identified itch as the strongest predictor of disease severity (47.97%, n = 189). Only 28.68% of respondents (n = 113) reported assessing itch often or always using the peak pruritus numerical scale (PP-NRS) or visual analogue scale (VAS), while 45.18% (n = 178) assessed itch sometimes and 26.14% (n = 103) never assessed itch. Reduction of itch was selected as the most important treatment goal by 56.35% of respondents (n = 222). In addition, 94.16% (n = 371) agreed or strongly agreed that they routinely try to understand the impact of itch on their patients, and 74.11% (n = 292) agreed or strongly agreed that there is currently a lack of effective treatment options for itch relief. The narrative review identified validated unidimensional itch measures (numerical rating scale (NRS), VAS, verbal rating scale (VRS)) and multidimensional instruments (Patient-Oriented Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (PO-SCORAD), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), 5-D itch scale, ItchyQOL), with clinical studies reporting that reductions of approximately 3-4 points on the itch NRS correspond to patient-perceived meaningful improvement. CONCLUSION: This large UK-based survey among dermatologists highlighted a gap between recognition of itch burden in atopic dermatitis and its systematic measurement in routine practice. The accompanying narrative review identified simple patient-reported measures, including the numerical rating scale (NRS), as feasible options to support more consistent itch assessment in routine care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dermatology and Therapy
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-026-01752-8
Primary Topic
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Skin: Assessing Itch in Atopic Dermatitis – Insights from UK Dermatologists. A Cross-Sectional Survey and Narrative Review

Kave Shams, Charlene Murphy, P Laws, Alberto Barea et al.
Dermatology and Therapy
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
article

Beyond the Skin: Assessing Itch in Atopic Dermatitis – Insights from UK Dermatologists. A Cross-Sectional Survey and Narrative Review

Kave Shams, Charlene Murphy, P Laws, Alberto Barea, Daniel Guirguis, Georgina Fremlin, Dominika Michno
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic itch is the most burdensome symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD), yet its routine assessment and measurement remain inconsistent. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterise current practices for evaluating itch in AD among UK dermatologists and, through a narrative review, to summarise available itch assessment tools and inform practical recommendations for routine practice. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional clinician survey and narrative literature review. A total of 394 dermatologists participated in the survey of itch and its assessment in AD during the 2024 British Association of Dermatologists Annual Meeting. RESULTS: Dermatologists reported itch as the most bothersome symptom in atopic dermatitis (78.68%, n = 310), and nearly half identified itch as the strongest predictor of disease severity (47.97%, n = 189). Only 28.68% of respondents (n = 113) reported assessing itch often or always using the peak pruritus numerical scale (PP-NRS) or visual analogue scale (VAS), while 45.18% (n = 178) assessed itch sometimes and 26.14% (n = 103) never assessed itch. Reduction of itch was selected as the most important treatment goal by 56.35% of respondents (n = 222). In addition, 94.16% (n = 371) agreed or strongly agreed that they routinely try to understand the impact of itch on their patients, and 74.11% (n = 292) agreed or strongly agreed that there is currently a lack of effective treatment options for itch relief. The narrative review identified validated unidimensional itch measures (numerical rating scale (NRS), VAS, verbal rating scale (VRS)) and multidimensional instruments (Patient-Oriented Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (PO-SCORAD), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), 5-D itch scale, ItchyQOL), with clinical studies reporting that reductions of approximately 3-4 points on the itch NRS correspond to patient-perceived meaningful improvement. CONCLUSION: This large UK-based survey among dermatologists highlighted a gap between recognition of itch burden in atopic dermatitis and its systematic measurement in routine practice. The accompanying narrative review identified simple patient-reported measures, including the numerical rating scale (NRS), as feasible options to support more consistent itch assessment in routine care.

Dermatology and Therapy
University of Leeds (GB), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Chapel Allerton Hospital (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (GB), Galderma (United States) (US), Galderma (France) (FR), Kingston Hospital (GB), National Eczema Society (GB)
Galderma
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.