On the Notation of R: From R+/R− to Operational Regimes of Openness

This note clarifies the notation of R introduced in La continuidad del aparecer: Ontología dinámica de la responsabilidad. The previous use of R+/R− has been shown to invite normative interpretations (good/bad) that are not intended by the framework. I propose replacing this notation with operational regimes of openness—expressed as R↑ / R↓ or, equivalently, expansion / restriction—in order to preserve the non-normative, structural character of the distinction. The change does not alter the ontology; it improves its legibility by making explicit that the distinction concerns differences in viability, reversibility, and articulability of configurations within a relational field. Responsibility is thereby understood as a structural non-indifference to how configurations affect the field’s capacity to sustain openness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19679788
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Notation of R: From R+/R− to Operational Regimes of Openness

Jorge José Alonso Ygea
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and History of Science
article

On the Notation of R: From R+/R− to Operational Regimes of Openness

Jorge José Alonso Ygea
article en

Abstract

This note clarifies the notation of R introduced in La continuidad del aparecer: Ontología dinámica de la responsabilidad. The previous use of R+/R− has been shown to invite normative interpretations (good/bad) that are not intended by the framework. I propose replacing this notation with operational regimes of openness—expressed as R↑ / R↓ or, equivalently, expansion / restriction—in order to preserve the non-normative, structural character of the distinction. The change does not alter the ontology; it improves its legibility by making explicit that the distinction concerns differences in viability, reversibility, and articulability of configurations within a relational field. Responsibility is thereby understood as a structural non-indifference to how configurations affect the field’s capacity to sustain openness.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.