Faculty development centers in world-class universities: a comparative study

Introduction The growing diversity of student populations in higher education highlights the increasing need for comprehensive and effective faculty development initiatives. Faculty development centers (FDCs), which originated in the mid-twentieth century and evolved primarily within the United States, have become critical components in improving teaching quality and enhancing institutional performance. Despite their global expansion, limited comparative research has examined their roles, structures, and functions across international contexts. Methods This qualitative comparative study investigated 26 faculty development centers at world-class universities. Data were collected from official institutional sources and systematically coded using NVivo 12 Pro. Results The analysis identified four central categories missions, content, tools, and functions and revealed two overarching themes underlying the work of these centers: university development and faculty development. The findings indicate that most centers seek to improve teaching effectiveness, strengthen research competencies, and promote academic leadership in alignment with broader institutional strategies. While these shared goals suggest a common global trajectory, the centers differ substantially in their organizational structures, program designs, and evaluation mechanisms. These variations reflect the unique contextual, cultural, and strategic priorities of their respective universities. Discussion In conclusion, the study underscores the pivotal role of faculty development centers in supporting both individual academic growth and institutional advancement. By synthesizing international best practices, this research offers valuable insights for policymakers, educational leaders, and higher education institutions aiming to establish, refine, or reinforce faculty development centers within diverse educational systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1795382
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Faculty development centers in world-class universities: a comparative study

Majid Asadpour, Pegah Mirzapour, Atiye Seyedreza Doulabi
Frontiers in Education
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Faculty development centers in world-class universities: a comparative study

Majid Asadpour, Pegah Mirzapour, Atiye Seyedreza Doulabi
article en

Abstract

Introduction The growing diversity of student populations in higher education highlights the increasing need for comprehensive and effective faculty development initiatives. Faculty development centers (FDCs), which originated in the mid-twentieth century and evolved primarily within the United States, have become critical components in improving teaching quality and enhancing institutional performance. Despite their global expansion, limited comparative research has examined their roles, structures, and functions across international contexts. Methods This qualitative comparative study investigated 26 faculty development centers at world-class universities. Data were collected from official institutional sources and systematically coded using NVivo 12 Pro. Results The analysis identified four central categories missions, content, tools, and functions and revealed two overarching themes underlying the work of these centers: university development and faculty development. The findings indicate that most centers seek to improve teaching effectiveness, strengthen research competencies, and promote academic leadership in alignment with broader institutional strategies. While these shared goals suggest a common global trajectory, the centers differ substantially in their organizational structures, program designs, and evaluation mechanisms. These variations reflect the unique contextual, cultural, and strategic priorities of their respective universities. Discussion In conclusion, the study underscores the pivotal role of faculty development centers in supporting both individual academic growth and institutional advancement. By synthesizing international best practices, this research offers valuable insights for policymakers, educational leaders, and higher education institutions aiming to establish, refine, or reinforce faculty development centers within diverse educational systems.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
University of Vienna (AT), Institute of Educational Sciences (MD), Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Universität Wien
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.