A grand strategy narrative of democratic hope: legitimizing the Biden administration’s democracy versus autocracy framework

This article unpacks the Biden administration’s democracy versus autocracy framework by examining it as a grand strategy narrative and suggests that the administration sought to legitimize its framework by appealing to hope for democracy during a time of democratic crisis. While previous scholarship on the ideational dimensions of U.S. foreign policy and grand strategy tends to emphasize appeals to American exceptionalism and threat construction, this analysis finds representations of democratic hope as a crucial but overlooked element in how the Biden administration sought to construct and legitimate their strategic vision. Through Burke’s ‘dramatic pentad’, the analysis shows how representations of democratic hope acknowledge uncertainty while maintaining democratic possibilities, reinforce democratic values as strategic interests, and integrate domestic challenges into a broader narrative of global democratic advancement. By positioning democracy as superior to autocracy, the narrative served to legitimize America’s international leadership role during a period of democratic precarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Politics
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-026-00769-2
Primary Topic
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A grand strategy narrative of democratic hope: legitimizing the Biden administration’s democracy versus autocracy framework

Sara Wissén
International Politics
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
article

A grand strategy narrative of democratic hope: legitimizing the Biden administration’s democracy versus autocracy framework

Sara Wissén
article en

Abstract

This article unpacks the Biden administration’s democracy versus autocracy framework by examining it as a grand strategy narrative and suggests that the administration sought to legitimize its framework by appealing to hope for democracy during a time of democratic crisis. While previous scholarship on the ideational dimensions of U.S. foreign policy and grand strategy tends to emphasize appeals to American exceptionalism and threat construction, this analysis finds representations of democratic hope as a crucial but overlooked element in how the Biden administration sought to construct and legitimate their strategic vision. Through Burke’s ‘dramatic pentad’, the analysis shows how representations of democratic hope acknowledge uncertainty while maintaining democratic possibilities, reinforce democratic values as strategic interests, and integrate domestic challenges into a broader narrative of global democratic advancement. By positioning democracy as superior to autocracy, the narrative served to legitimize America’s international leadership role during a period of democratic precarity.

International Politics
Swedish Defence University (SE)
Försvarshögskolan
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A grand strategy narrative of democratic hope: legitimizing the Biden administration’s democracy versus autocracy framework — Sara Wissén · International Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS