Deepfakes, Public Reason, and Consent

The rise of deepfake technology presents significant problems to democratic dialogue, confidence in knowledge, and legal systems regulating consent. Deepfakes artificially created media can alter audio, video, and pictures with remarkable realism, frequently obscuring the boundary between reality and deception. This study analyzes the epistemological consequences of deepfakes on public reason, the deliberative process by which citizens participate in rational discourse about political and social matters. This analysis critically assesses the impact of deepfakes on informed consent, especially in scenarios where synthetic media is employed to distort political ideas, misrepresent individuals, or sway public opinion. This paper contends that current legal and ethical frameworks are inadequate to confront the emerging threats associated with synthetic political realities by synthesizing concepts from philosophy, information ethics, and constitutional theory. The study closes by recommending legislative interventions, regulatory initiatives, and epistemic protections aimed at preserving the integrity of democratic discussion and human autonomy in the digital era.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19686919
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deepfakes, Public Reason, and Consent

Jubaer Shah
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Deepfakes, Public Reason, and Consent

Jubaer Shah
article en

Abstract

The rise of deepfake technology presents significant problems to democratic dialogue, confidence in knowledge, and legal systems regulating consent. Deepfakes artificially created media can alter audio, video, and pictures with remarkable realism, frequently obscuring the boundary between reality and deception. This study analyzes the epistemological consequences of deepfakes on public reason, the deliberative process by which citizens participate in rational discourse about political and social matters. This analysis critically assesses the impact of deepfakes on informed consent, especially in scenarios where synthetic media is employed to distort political ideas, misrepresent individuals, or sway public opinion. This paper contends that current legal and ethical frameworks are inadequate to confront the emerging threats associated with synthetic political realities by synthesizing concepts from philosophy, information ethics, and constitutional theory. The study closes by recommending legislative interventions, regulatory initiatives, and epistemic protections aimed at preserving the integrity of democratic discussion and human autonomy in the digital era.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.