Clinical outcomes of rigid bronchoscopic airway interventions: insights from an Indian tertiary care center

Rigid bronchoscopy (RB) forms an indispensable part of the interventional bronchoscopist's skills, allowing the performance of complex airway interventions for a variety of benign and malignant airway disorders. Experiential data on the procedure is limited, particularly in adults. We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records from 82 adult patients who underwent RB at our center. The primary objective was to evaluate the clinical indications, procedural outcomes, complication rates, and overall efficacy of RB in this cohort. Collected data included patient demographics, presenting symptoms, etiological diagnoses, and anesthesia-related parameters such as induction agents, maintenance protocols, sedation strategies, and the use of neuromuscular blockade. Post-procedural outcomes and follow-up mortality were also assessed. The mean patient age was 56.2±12.6 years, with 71.9% males. Common symptoms were cough (90.2%) and dyspnea (82.9%). Malignancies accounted for 90.2% of cases, with lung cancer being the most prevalent (68.2%). RB was primarily performed for stenting (63.4%) and tumor debulking (29.2%). Total intravenous anesthesia was used in 92.6%, with mean induction and reversal times of 75.3±4.3 seconds and 10.69±2.4 minutes, respectively. Minor complications occurred in 29.3% (bleeding 29.3%, bronchospasm 17.1%, and hypoxia 13.4%) and major complications in 2.4%. After the procedure, immediate extubation was achieved in 49 patients (59.8%), while 24 (29.3%) required short-term ventilator support (<24 h) and 9 (11.0%) required prolonged support (>24 h). The median hospital stay was 7 days (interquartile range 5-11). Symptomatic improvement at discharge was observed in 72/82 patients (87.8%). In-hospital mortality was 6.1% (5/82), mainly due to severe infections (hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia) or massive endobronchial bleeding. Among patients with available follow-up (n=52), 3-month mortality was 11.5% (n=6). In this real-world cohort, RB demonstrated a high success rate with minimal complications, reinforcing its role as a critical tool in managing complex airway conditions. The procedure demonstrated high efficacy, particularly in malignant cases, with acceptable complication rates. Dedicated training is essential to enhance experience, gain expertise, and ensure optimal outcomes while minimizing procedural risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2026.3686
Primary Topic
Tracheal and airway disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes of rigid bronchoscopic airway interventions: insights from an Indian tertiary care center

Arjun Kumar, Suyash Singh Rathore, G Sindhwani, Mayank Mishra et al.
Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease
Tracheal and airway disorders
article

Clinical outcomes of rigid bronchoscopic airway interventions: insights from an Indian tertiary care center

Arjun Kumar, Suyash Singh Rathore, G Sindhwani, Mayank Mishra, Akhlesh Rajpoot
article en

Abstract

Rigid bronchoscopy (RB) forms an indispensable part of the interventional bronchoscopist's skills, allowing the performance of complex airway interventions for a variety of benign and malignant airway disorders. Experiential data on the procedure is limited, particularly in adults. We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records from 82 adult patients who underwent RB at our center. The primary objective was to evaluate the clinical indications, procedural outcomes, complication rates, and overall efficacy of RB in this cohort. Collected data included patient demographics, presenting symptoms, etiological diagnoses, and anesthesia-related parameters such as induction agents, maintenance protocols, sedation strategies, and the use of neuromuscular blockade. Post-procedural outcomes and follow-up mortality were also assessed. The mean patient age was 56.2±12.6 years, with 71.9% males. Common symptoms were cough (90.2%) and dyspnea (82.9%). Malignancies accounted for 90.2% of cases, with lung cancer being the most prevalent (68.2%). RB was primarily performed for stenting (63.4%) and tumor debulking (29.2%). Total intravenous anesthesia was used in 92.6%, with mean induction and reversal times of 75.3±4.3 seconds and 10.69±2.4 minutes, respectively. Minor complications occurred in 29.3% (bleeding 29.3%, bronchospasm 17.1%, and hypoxia 13.4%) and major complications in 2.4%. After the procedure, immediate extubation was achieved in 49 patients (59.8%), while 24 (29.3%) required short-term ventilator support (<24 h) and 9 (11.0%) required prolonged support (>24 h). The median hospital stay was 7 days (interquartile range 5-11). Symptomatic improvement at discharge was observed in 72/82 patients (87.8%). In-hospital mortality was 6.1% (5/82), mainly due to severe infections (hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia) or massive endobronchial bleeding. Among patients with available follow-up (n=52), 3-month mortality was 11.5% (n=6). In this real-world cohort, RB demonstrated a high success rate with minimal complications, reinforcing its role as a critical tool in managing complex airway conditions. The procedure demonstrated high efficacy, particularly in malignant cases, with acceptable complication rates. Dedicated training is essential to enhance experience, gain expertise, and ensure optimal outcomes while minimizing procedural risks.

Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh (IN)
All-India Institute of Medical Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Tracheal and airway disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.