Outcomes of Early Compared to Late Interval Cholecystectomy Post‐Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Patients Diagnosed With Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis is a common surgical emergency. In high-risk patients, percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is often used as a temporizing measure before interval cholecystectomy (IC). The optimal timing of IC remains uncertain. This study evaluates outcomes of early versus late IC following PC. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to November 2025 for studies comparing early and late IC after PC. Primary outcomes were perioperative complications. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative duration, blood loss, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and catheter-related complications. Subgroup analyses were performed using 1-month and 8-week interval cut-offs. RESULTS: Twelve retrospective studies comprising 10,328 patients (early n = 8690; late n = 1638) were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable, although BMI was slightly lower in the early IC group (MD -0.26, 95% CI: -0.50, -0.03, p = 0.03). Overall postoperative complications, major perioperative complications, bile duct injury, subtotal cholecystectomy, and mortality were similar between groups. Conversion to open surgery, operative duration, and postoperative LOS were also comparable. Intraoperative blood loss was greater in the early IC group (MD 16.65, 95% CI: 2.24, 31.06, p = 0.02). Early IC was associated with fewer catheter-related complications (RR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.66, p = 0.005). Risk ratio analysis suggested increased intra-abdominal abscess in the early IC group; however, risk difference analysis showed only a small absolute increase, indicating limited clinical significance. In subgroup analysis using a 1-month cut-off, early IC was associated with significantly fewer postoperative complications (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.79, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Early IC may confer clinical benefit in appropriately selected patients, with fewer postoperative and catheter-related complications despite risk of greater intraoperative blood loss. A 1-month threshold may represent a pragmatic definition of late IC. A risk-stratified approach remains essential, and further prospective studies are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70375
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes of Early Compared to Late Interval Cholecystectomy Post‐Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Patients Diagnosed With Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Feng Yi Cheo, Eliza I-Lin Sin
World Journal of Surgery
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Outcomes of Early Compared to Late Interval Cholecystectomy Post‐Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Patients Diagnosed With Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Feng Yi Cheo, Eliza I-Lin Sin
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis is a common surgical emergency. In high-risk patients, percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is often used as a temporizing measure before interval cholecystectomy (IC). The optimal timing of IC remains uncertain. This study evaluates outcomes of early versus late IC following PC. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to November 2025 for studies comparing early and late IC after PC. Primary outcomes were perioperative complications. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative duration, blood loss, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and catheter-related complications. Subgroup analyses were performed using 1-month and 8-week interval cut-offs. RESULTS: Twelve retrospective studies comprising 10,328 patients (early n = 8690; late n = 1638) were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable, although BMI was slightly lower in the early IC group (MD -0.26, 95% CI: -0.50, -0.03, p = 0.03). Overall postoperative complications, major perioperative complications, bile duct injury, subtotal cholecystectomy, and mortality were similar between groups. Conversion to open surgery, operative duration, and postoperative LOS were also comparable. Intraoperative blood loss was greater in the early IC group (MD 16.65, 95% CI: 2.24, 31.06, p = 0.02). Early IC was associated with fewer catheter-related complications (RR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.66, p = 0.005). Risk ratio analysis suggested increased intra-abdominal abscess in the early IC group; however, risk difference analysis showed only a small absolute increase, indicating limited clinical significance. In subgroup analysis using a 1-month cut-off, early IC was associated with significantly fewer postoperative complications (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.79, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Early IC may confer clinical benefit in appropriately selected patients, with fewer postoperative and catheter-related complications despite risk of greater intraoperative blood loss. A 1-month threshold may represent a pragmatic definition of late IC. A risk-stratified approach remains essential, and further prospective studies are warranted.

World Journal of Surgery
Singapore General Hospital (SG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.