Variant Calling in the Dark Genome: Benchmarking SNV Calls in the Flanks of Structural Variants

Single nucleotide variant calling protocols routinely discard calls in the regions immediately flanking structural variants (often 50 bp either side) because it is technically challenging to call them accurately. Although there are undoubtedly true variants of interest in these regions, many remain hidden as they are considered too difficult to distinguish from false positive calls. Nevertheless, with advances in both long-read sequencing and deep-learning algorithms, it is increasingly possible to resolve structural variants and their context more accurately. To provide guidance on SNV calling in the regions flanking structural variants (SVs), and to facilitate ongoing method development, we refined data from the Chinese Quartet project to construct a benchmarking set of 1000 SVs (more precisely, 299 deletions and 701 insertions), each on a completely assembled chromosome arm, supported by multiple sequencing technologies, and manually curated. We then used this real data, alongside corroboratory simulated data, to evaluate the performance of 35 short-read and 19 long-read variant calling pipelines at calling SNVs in their vicinity, representing combinations of up to 9 read aligners with up to 10 variant callers. Our datasets extend the scope of human benchmarking resources into these specific regions of the 'dark genome' and our results highlight practical strategies for variant calling within them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/gpbjnl/qzag031
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variant Calling in the Dark Genome: Benchmarking SNV Calls in the Flanks of Structural Variants

Stephen J. Bush, Ningxin Dang, Jiadong Lin, Yongyong Kang et al.
Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
article

Variant Calling in the Dark Genome: Benchmarking SNV Calls in the Flanks of Structural Variants

Stephen J. Bush, Ningxin Dang, Jiadong Lin, Yongyong Kang, Z K Li, Peng Jia, Yutong Xie, Kai Ye
article en

Abstract

Single nucleotide variant calling protocols routinely discard calls in the regions immediately flanking structural variants (often 50 bp either side) because it is technically challenging to call them accurately. Although there are undoubtedly true variants of interest in these regions, many remain hidden as they are considered too difficult to distinguish from false positive calls. Nevertheless, with advances in both long-read sequencing and deep-learning algorithms, it is increasingly possible to resolve structural variants and their context more accurately. To provide guidance on SNV calling in the regions flanking structural variants (SVs), and to facilitate ongoing method development, we refined data from the Chinese Quartet project to construct a benchmarking set of 1000 SVs (more precisely, 299 deletions and 701 insertions), each on a completely assembled chromosome arm, supported by multiple sequencing technologies, and manually curated. We then used this real data, alongside corroboratory simulated data, to evaluate the performance of 35 short-read and 19 long-read variant calling pipelines at calling SNVs in their vicinity, representing combinations of up to 9 read aligners with up to 10 variant callers. Our datasets extend the scope of human benchmarking resources into these specific regions of the 'dark genome' and our results highlight practical strategies for variant calling within them.

Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics
Leiden University (NL), First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.