Provider Perspectives on Fall Prevention Exercise Services in Ontario: A Qualitative Analysis

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of older adults (≥65) fall annually, yet community delivery of evidence-based fall prevention exercise remains poorly understood. This qualitative study explores fall prevention exercise service delivery from the perspective of exercise providers in Ontario. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 exercise providers, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, and analyzed data thematically. FINDINGS: While providers valued evidence-based balance and functional training, those in large-group settings struggled with exercise tailoring and progression. Instead, many prioritized building trust, creating safe environments, and facilitating socialization. BARRIERS WERE HIGHLY CONTEXTUAL: kinesiologists lacked resources, independent providers lacked networking, and municipal/non-profit staff faced low pay and organizational competition. DISCUSSION: To enhance implementation of fall prevention exercise services, support must address unique contextual barriers while balancing clinical tailoring with participant adherence. Our insights suggest that leveraging existing community services and focusing on provider-specific supports are essential for effective implementation of fall prevention exercise services in Ontario.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0714980826100646
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Provider Perspectives on Fall Prevention Exercise Services in Ontario: A Qualitative Analysis

Nicholas Tibert, Lora Giangregorio, Jennifer Watt, A. A. Veroniki et al.
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Provider Perspectives on Fall Prevention Exercise Services in Ontario: A Qualitative Analysis

Nicholas Tibert, Lora Giangregorio, Jennifer Watt, A. A. Veroniki, Phil Chilibeck, Jennifer Tomasone, Zach Weston, Joanna Sale
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of older adults (≥65) fall annually, yet community delivery of evidence-based fall prevention exercise remains poorly understood. This qualitative study explores fall prevention exercise service delivery from the perspective of exercise providers in Ontario. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 exercise providers, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, and analyzed data thematically. FINDINGS: While providers valued evidence-based balance and functional training, those in large-group settings struggled with exercise tailoring and progression. Instead, many prioritized building trust, creating safe environments, and facilitating socialization. BARRIERS WERE HIGHLY CONTEXTUAL: kinesiologists lacked resources, independent providers lacked networking, and municipal/non-profit staff faced low pay and organizational competition. DISCUSSION: To enhance implementation of fall prevention exercise services, support must address unique contextual barriers while balancing clinical tailoring with participant adherence. Our insights suggest that leveraging existing community services and focusing on provider-specific supports are essential for effective implementation of fall prevention exercise services in Ontario.

Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
University of Waterloo (CA), John Brown University (US), University of Toronto (CA), Queen's University (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Research Institute for Aging (CA), Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.