An investigation into the use of a PTA Monitor in anaesthesia and analgesia

Background: The monitoring of nociception in dogs and cats under general anaesthesia can be challenging. Currently, haemodynamic reactivity alongside no change in anaesthetic depth is the most accurate way of detecting nociception in anaesthetised patients. Recent technologies, adapted from human medicine, use heart rate variability and respiratory patterns to calculate parasympathetic activity in the body, such as the Parasympathetic Tone Activity (PTA) Monitor. This numerical value can then be used to understand the patient's comfort level and titrate analgesics accordingly. Methods: Prospective, non-randomised controlled study with retrospective and questionnaire elements. A total of 36 canine and feline patients undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy procedures were recruited. The frequency of intra-operative rescue analgesia (RA) administration between the PTA Monitor (PTA) group and the retrospective group (no PTA Monitor (nPTA)) were analysed. An online questionnaire comprising Likert scales and open and closed questions were given to the Registered Veterinary Nurses monitoring general anaesthesia in the practice to comprehend their understanding of the machine and the possible value it adds to their monitoring. Results: Out of the 36 patients, 44.4% ( n =16) were in the PTA group and 55.5% ( n =20) were in the nPTA group. A total of 60% ( n =12) of patients in the nPTA group and 62% ( n =10) in the PTA group required the administration of RA during their surgical procedure. A statistically significant association was not observed between the frequency of RA administration and the use of the PTA monitor ( P =0.87), or between the use of the PTA monitor and drug classification ( P =0.96). The online questionnaire identified that of the participants, 80% ( n =4) found the machine to be valuable when monitoring nociception during general anaesthesia, alongside their usual monitoring techniques. Conclusion: Despite the absence of statistical significance of the impact of the PTA Monitor on RA administration, the clinical significance of the machine was highlighted by RVNs. Future research is required to further understand the value of this machine in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Veterinary Nurse
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12968/vetn.2025.0055
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An investigation into the use of a PTA Monitor in anaesthesia and analgesia

Katherine Hart, Sophie Horton-Smith
The Veterinary Nurse
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

An investigation into the use of a PTA Monitor in anaesthesia and analgesia

Katherine Hart, Sophie Horton-Smith
article en

Abstract

Background: The monitoring of nociception in dogs and cats under general anaesthesia can be challenging. Currently, haemodynamic reactivity alongside no change in anaesthetic depth is the most accurate way of detecting nociception in anaesthetised patients. Recent technologies, adapted from human medicine, use heart rate variability and respiratory patterns to calculate parasympathetic activity in the body, such as the Parasympathetic Tone Activity (PTA) Monitor. This numerical value can then be used to understand the patient's comfort level and titrate analgesics accordingly. Methods: Prospective, non-randomised controlled study with retrospective and questionnaire elements. A total of 36 canine and feline patients undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy procedures were recruited. The frequency of intra-operative rescue analgesia (RA) administration between the PTA Monitor (PTA) group and the retrospective group (no PTA Monitor (nPTA)) were analysed. An online questionnaire comprising Likert scales and open and closed questions were given to the Registered Veterinary Nurses monitoring general anaesthesia in the practice to comprehend their understanding of the machine and the possible value it adds to their monitoring. Results: Out of the 36 patients, 44.4% ( n =16) were in the PTA group and 55.5% ( n =20) were in the nPTA group. A total of 60% ( n =12) of patients in the nPTA group and 62% ( n =10) in the PTA group required the administration of RA during their surgical procedure. A statistically significant association was not observed between the frequency of RA administration and the use of the PTA monitor ( P =0.87), or between the use of the PTA monitor and drug classification ( P =0.96). The online questionnaire identified that of the participants, 80% ( n =4) found the machine to be valuable when monitoring nociception during general anaesthesia, alongside their usual monitoring techniques. Conclusion: Despite the absence of statistical significance of the impact of the PTA Monitor on RA administration, the clinical significance of the machine was highlighted by RVNs. Future research is required to further understand the value of this machine in clinical practice.

The Veterinary NurseVol. 17(3)
Animal Welfare Institute (US), SNV Netherlands Development Organisation (NL), Harper Adams University (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.