Integration of information value with machine learning method for an enhanced predictive performance in landslide susceptibility mapping

To address the issues of balancing predictive accuracy with model interpretability in landslide susceptibility mapping, this study integrates Information Value (IV) with machine learning algorithms including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and XGBoost to build a hybrid framework for enhanced landslide susceptibility assessment. The substantive methodological innovations in this research are: 1) a sequential three-stage feature selection protocol combining correlation analysis, Variance Inflation Factor (VIF), and entropy-based Information Gain, which preserve geologically significant variables with non-linear relationships; 2) an IV-guided non-landslide sampling strategy that systematically reduces spatial bias by restricting sampling to the lowest susceptibility tertile; and 3) a comprehensive validation framework integrating statistical metrics, spatial distribution analysis, and spatial concordance verification using 372 GPS-documented inventory sites (74.5%), overlaid post-hoc on final susceptibility maps. Considering slope, aspect, elevation, curvature, TWI, annual rainfall, geology, soil type, NDVI, LULC, and proximity to roads, rivers, and faults as the causative factors through rigorous screening, XGBoost demonstrated the highest performance with 96% accuracy, 0.991 AUC-ROC (95% CI: 0.979–0.995), and 96% F1-score compared to RF with 82% accuracy and 0.888 AUC-ROC (95% CI: 0.873–0.903) and SVM with 91% accuracy and 0.944 AUC-ROC (95% CI: 0.932–0.956). Jenks natural breaks revealed that the machine learning models allocate substantially larger proportions to Very High susceptibility zones (XGBoost: 39.75%, RF: 26.33%, SVM: 39.33%) than the IV (12.83%), capturing complex multivariate geospatial relationships. The dual-pathway framework exhibits transferability to data-scarce regions, where IV can generate preliminary assessments with minimal landslide inventories to guide strategic field verification campaigns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Geoscience
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-026-00517-2
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integration of information value with machine learning method for an enhanced predictive performance in landslide susceptibility mapping

Buddhi Raj Joshi, Indra Prasad Acharya, Netra Prakash Bhandary, K. C. Niraj et al.
Discover Geoscience
Landslides and related hazards
article

Integration of information value with machine learning method for an enhanced predictive performance in landslide susceptibility mapping

Buddhi Raj Joshi, Indra Prasad Acharya, Netra Prakash Bhandary, K. C. Niraj, Chakra Bhandari
article en

Abstract

To address the issues of balancing predictive accuracy with model interpretability in landslide susceptibility mapping, this study integrates Information Value (IV) with machine learning algorithms including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and XGBoost to build a hybrid framework for enhanced landslide susceptibility assessment. The substantive methodological innovations in this research are: 1) a sequential three-stage feature selection protocol combining correlation analysis, Variance Inflation Factor (VIF), and entropy-based Information Gain, which preserve geologically significant variables with non-linear relationships; 2) an IV-guided non-landslide sampling strategy that systematically reduces spatial bias by restricting sampling to the lowest susceptibility tertile; and 3) a comprehensive validation framework integrating statistical metrics, spatial distribution analysis, and spatial concordance verification using 372 GPS-documented inventory sites (74.5%), overlaid post-hoc on final susceptibility maps. Considering slope, aspect, elevation, curvature, TWI, annual rainfall, geology, soil type, NDVI, LULC, and proximity to roads, rivers, and faults as the causative factors through rigorous screening, XGBoost demonstrated the highest performance with 96% accuracy, 0.991 AUC-ROC (95% CI: 0.979–0.995), and 96% F1-score compared to RF with 82% accuracy and 0.888 AUC-ROC (95% CI: 0.873–0.903) and SVM with 91% accuracy and 0.944 AUC-ROC (95% CI: 0.932–0.956). Jenks natural breaks revealed that the machine learning models allocate substantially larger proportions to Very High susceptibility zones (XGBoost: 39.75%, RF: 26.33%, SVM: 39.33%) than the IV (12.83%), capturing complex multivariate geospatial relationships. The dual-pathway framework exhibits transferability to data-scarce regions, where IV can generate preliminary assessments with minimal landslide inventories to guide strategic field verification campaigns.

Discover GeoscienceVol. 4(1)
Pokhara University (NP), Tribhuvan University (NP), Matsuyama University (JP), Institute of Engineering (NP), Ehime University (JP), Nepal Academy of Science and Technology (NP)
Pokhara University, European Space Agency, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.