The adverse prognostic impact of reduced chemotherapy dose intensity appears attenuated in early breast cancer patients with treatment-relevant neutropenia: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE: Maintaining a relative dose intensity (RDI) ≥ 85% during chemotherapy is established as a critical threshold for optimal outcomes in early breast cancer. This study investigates whether the prognostic impact of reduced RDI differs based on the presence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia requiring treatment modifications (rCIN). METHODS: We analyzed 730 patients with early breast cancer receiving anthracycline/cyclophosphamide and taxane-based chemotherapy at the University Hospital Tübingen between 2014 and 2021. rCIN was defined as any dose reduction > 15%, delay ≥ 5 days, or discontinuation attributed to neutropenia per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Patients were stratified into four groups based on RDI (≥ 85% vs. < 85%) and rCIN status. Differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and predictors of DFS were evaluated by Cox regression. RESULTS: rCIN occurred in 21.8% of patients, with 59.7% of rCIN patients receiving RDI < 85% versus 16.1% of non-rCIN patients (p < 0.001). Despite lower RDI, rCIN patients maintained similar pathological complete response rates after neoadjuvant therapy. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with RDI < 85% without rCIN had significantly worse DFS and OS than the reference group with RDI ≥ 85% without rCIN (DFS p = 0.003; OS p = 0.002), while patients with RDI < 85% with rCIN showed comparable survival to high-RDI groups (all pairwise p > 0.170). Direct comparison between the two reduced-RDI groups was not statistically significant for either DFS or OS (DFS p = 0.055; OS p = 0.159). Cox regression confirmed RDI < 85% as a negative prognostic factor (HR 2.53; 95% CI 1.38-4.65; p = 0.003). The rCIN × RDI < 85% interaction term was not statistically significant (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.12-1.60; p = 0.212). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort, reduced RDI was associated with poorer outcomes, particularly in patients without rCIN. By contrast, patients with RDI < 85% and rCIN showed no significant differences in Kaplan-Meier survival, and similar pathological complete response rates were observed despite lower RDI in the neoadjuvant subgroup. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger prospective studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-026-08426-y
Primary Topic
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The adverse prognostic impact of reduced chemotherapy dose intensity appears attenuated in early breast cancer patients with treatment-relevant neutropenia: a retrospective cohort study

S Brucker, B. Schönfisch, Alexander Englisch, E. M. Grischke et al.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
article

The adverse prognostic impact of reduced chemotherapy dose intensity appears attenuated in early breast cancer patients with treatment-relevant neutropenia: a retrospective cohort study

S Brucker, B. Schönfisch, Alexander Englisch, E. M. Grischke, J. Englisch, A. D. Hartkopf, D. Dannehl, L. L. Volmer, T. Engler, K. Eissler
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Maintaining a relative dose intensity (RDI) ≥ 85% during chemotherapy is established as a critical threshold for optimal outcomes in early breast cancer. This study investigates whether the prognostic impact of reduced RDI differs based on the presence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia requiring treatment modifications (rCIN). METHODS: We analyzed 730 patients with early breast cancer receiving anthracycline/cyclophosphamide and taxane-based chemotherapy at the University Hospital Tübingen between 2014 and 2021. rCIN was defined as any dose reduction > 15%, delay ≥ 5 days, or discontinuation attributed to neutropenia per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Patients were stratified into four groups based on RDI (≥ 85% vs. < 85%) and rCIN status. Differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and predictors of DFS were evaluated by Cox regression. RESULTS: rCIN occurred in 21.8% of patients, with 59.7% of rCIN patients receiving RDI < 85% versus 16.1% of non-rCIN patients (p < 0.001). Despite lower RDI, rCIN patients maintained similar pathological complete response rates after neoadjuvant therapy. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with RDI < 85% without rCIN had significantly worse DFS and OS than the reference group with RDI ≥ 85% without rCIN (DFS p = 0.003; OS p = 0.002), while patients with RDI < 85% with rCIN showed comparable survival to high-RDI groups (all pairwise p > 0.170). Direct comparison between the two reduced-RDI groups was not statistically significant for either DFS or OS (DFS p = 0.055; OS p = 0.159). Cox regression confirmed RDI < 85% as a negative prognostic factor (HR 2.53; 95% CI 1.38-4.65; p = 0.003). The rCIN × RDI < 85% interaction term was not statistically significant (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.12-1.60; p = 0.212). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort, reduced RDI was associated with poorer outcomes, particularly in patients without rCIN. By contrast, patients with RDI < 85% and rCIN showed no significant differences in Kaplan-Meier survival, and similar pathological complete response rates were observed despite lower RDI in the neoadjuvant subgroup. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger prospective studies.

Archives of Gynecology and ObstetricsVol. 313(1)
University of Tübingen (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.