Generic versus personalized foot-ground contact models for predictive simulations of walking: Is personalization worth the effort?

Purpose: Quantification of walking function, including joint motions, ground reactions, and joint loads, outside the lab is a growing research area. Because only joint motions can currently be measured outside the lab, researchers are utilizing tracking optimizations of walking to estimate associated ground reactions and inverse dynamic joint loads. However, foot-ground contact models used in such optimizations have been generic rather than personalized, which may limit the accuracy of estimated ground reactions and joint loads. This study compares the predictive capabilities of generic versus personalized foot-ground contact models. Methods: Generic and personalized foot-ground contact models were evaluated in calibration and tracking optimizations performed using experimental walking data collected from three subjects in varying states of health. Foot-only calibration optimizations evaluated how well both models could reproduce experimental ground reaction and foot motion data while tracking both types of data simultaneously, while whole-body tracking optimizations evaluated how well both models could reproduce experimental ground reactions, joint motion, and joint load data while tracking only experimental joint motion data and achieving dynamic consistency. Results: For all three subjects and both types of optimizations, personalized foot-ground contact models reproduced experimental ground reaction, joint motion, and joint load data more accurately than generic foot-ground contact models. Conclusion: Personalized foot-ground contact models can improve the accuracy with which ground reactions and joint loads can be estimated via tracking optimizations of walking using only experimental motion data as inputs. Personalized models require little time and effort to calibrate using freely available software tools and should improve the accuracy of predictive simulations of walking as well.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.16.719049
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generic versus personalized foot-ground contact models for predictive simulations of walking: Is personalization worth the effort?

Benjamin J. Fregly, Spencer T. Williams, Geng Li
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Generic versus personalized foot-ground contact models for predictive simulations of walking: Is personalization worth the effort?

Benjamin J. Fregly, Spencer T. Williams, Geng Li
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Quantification of walking function, including joint motions, ground reactions, and joint loads, outside the lab is a growing research area. Because only joint motions can currently be measured outside the lab, researchers are utilizing tracking optimizations of walking to estimate associated ground reactions and inverse dynamic joint loads. However, foot-ground contact models used in such optimizations have been generic rather than personalized, which may limit the accuracy of estimated ground reactions and joint loads. This study compares the predictive capabilities of generic versus personalized foot-ground contact models. Methods: Generic and personalized foot-ground contact models were evaluated in calibration and tracking optimizations performed using experimental walking data collected from three subjects in varying states of health. Foot-only calibration optimizations evaluated how well both models could reproduce experimental ground reaction and foot motion data while tracking both types of data simultaneously, while whole-body tracking optimizations evaluated how well both models could reproduce experimental ground reactions, joint motion, and joint load data while tracking only experimental joint motion data and achieving dynamic consistency. Results: For all three subjects and both types of optimizations, personalized foot-ground contact models reproduced experimental ground reaction, joint motion, and joint load data more accurately than generic foot-ground contact models. Conclusion: Personalized foot-ground contact models can improve the accuracy with which ground reactions and joint loads can be estimated via tracking optimizations of walking using only experimental motion data as inputs. Personalized models require little time and effort to calibrate using freely available software tools and should improve the accuracy of predictive simulations of walking as well.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Rice University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.