School-based interventions to enhance academic self-efficacy in secondary education: a systematic review emphasizing socioeconomically disadvantaged students

This systematic review examined school-based interventions designed to enhance academic self-efficacy (ASE) among secondary school students, focusing on learners from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 18 empirical studies published during 2000–2024 were analyzed. Eligible studies employed quantitative designs and reported measurable effects on ASE. The synthesis revealed that 14 studies reported significant improvements in students’ ASE, with most effect sizes ranging from moderate to large. Programs combining self-regulatory, motivational, and social-relational components—which are often embedded within social and emotional learning (SEL) frameworks—were the most effective. Structured feedback, guided reflection, and relational support emerged as key impact mechanisms. Interventions explicitly addressing disadvantaged students and integrating SEL principles consistently produced strong effects, suggesting that relational and contextual alignment enhanced their impact. These findings indicate that ASE is a malleable construct that can be fostered through pedagogically structured and context-sensitive school interventions. Supporting ASE development may help reduce barriers to learning and achievement, particularly among disadvantaged students. Future studies should examine similar interventions’ long-term outcomes and explore how equity-oriented intervention designs can support sustained self-efficacy development across diverse learner populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1740924
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

School-based interventions to enhance academic self-efficacy in secondary education: a systematic review emphasizing socioeconomically disadvantaged students

Josefine Schlichtenhorst
Frontiers in Education
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

School-based interventions to enhance academic self-efficacy in secondary education: a systematic review emphasizing socioeconomically disadvantaged students

Josefine Schlichtenhorst
article en

Abstract

This systematic review examined school-based interventions designed to enhance academic self-efficacy (ASE) among secondary school students, focusing on learners from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 18 empirical studies published during 2000–2024 were analyzed. Eligible studies employed quantitative designs and reported measurable effects on ASE. The synthesis revealed that 14 studies reported significant improvements in students’ ASE, with most effect sizes ranging from moderate to large. Programs combining self-regulatory, motivational, and social-relational components—which are often embedded within social and emotional learning (SEL) frameworks—were the most effective. Structured feedback, guided reflection, and relational support emerged as key impact mechanisms. Interventions explicitly addressing disadvantaged students and integrating SEL principles consistently produced strong effects, suggesting that relational and contextual alignment enhanced their impact. These findings indicate that ASE is a malleable construct that can be fostered through pedagogically structured and context-sensitive school interventions. Supporting ASE development may help reduce barriers to learning and achievement, particularly among disadvantaged students. Future studies should examine similar interventions’ long-term outcomes and explore how equity-oriented intervention designs can support sustained self-efficacy development across diverse learner populations.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
Pädagogische Hochschule Vorarlberg (AT)
Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.