Comparative Outcomes of Transferred vs Nontransferred Cardiogenic Shock Patients Receiving Impella Support

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high in-hospital mortality despite advances in temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices, such as Impella. However, access to Impella is not uniform across health care settings, often necessitating interhospital transfers. The impact of transfer status on Impella use, and outcomes in CS remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare in-hospital mortality, complications, tMCS utilization patterns, and resource utilization between transferred and nontransferred CS patients receiving Impella support. METHODS: Using National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2021, all CS patients receiving Impella were identified. Patients were grouped by transfer status: those transferred from acute care hospitals vs those managed in-house. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included rates of complications (acute limb ischemia, acute renal failure, and renal replacement therapy), tMCS utilization patterns, and hospital resource utilization. Outcomes were compared using Pearson chi-square test and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 11,264 patients received Impella for CS, and 28.3% were transferred from other hospitals. Sixteen percent had acute myocardial infarction at presentation. Mortality rates were similar between groups (41.6% vs 41.0%; P = 0.589). Transfer status was associated with higher rates of complications, including acute renal failure (71.5% vs 60.3%; P < 0.001) and renal replacement therapy (16.0% vs 11.6%; P < 0.001), as well as higher utilization of intra-aortic balloon pump and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Transfer status was also associated with longer hospital stays and higher hospitalization costs. These associations persisted with propensity score-based analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, transfer status was associated with similar in-hospital mortality but higher complication rates, greater use of additional tMCS, and increased resource utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACC Advances
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.102739
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Outcomes of Transferred vs Nontransferred Cardiogenic Shock Patients Receiving Impella Support

Karnav Modi, Paramdeep Baweja, Talal Asif, Taiyeb Khumri
JACC Advances
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Comparative Outcomes of Transferred vs Nontransferred Cardiogenic Shock Patients Receiving Impella Support

Karnav Modi, Paramdeep Baweja, Talal Asif, Taiyeb Khumri
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high in-hospital mortality despite advances in temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices, such as Impella. However, access to Impella is not uniform across health care settings, often necessitating interhospital transfers. The impact of transfer status on Impella use, and outcomes in CS remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare in-hospital mortality, complications, tMCS utilization patterns, and resource utilization between transferred and nontransferred CS patients receiving Impella support. METHODS: Using National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2021, all CS patients receiving Impella were identified. Patients were grouped by transfer status: those transferred from acute care hospitals vs those managed in-house. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included rates of complications (acute limb ischemia, acute renal failure, and renal replacement therapy), tMCS utilization patterns, and hospital resource utilization. Outcomes were compared using Pearson chi-square test and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 11,264 patients received Impella for CS, and 28.3% were transferred from other hospitals. Sixteen percent had acute myocardial infarction at presentation. Mortality rates were similar between groups (41.6% vs 41.0%; P = 0.589). Transfer status was associated with higher rates of complications, including acute renal failure (71.5% vs 60.3%; P < 0.001) and renal replacement therapy (16.0% vs 11.6%; P < 0.001), as well as higher utilization of intra-aortic balloon pump and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Transfer status was also associated with longer hospital stays and higher hospitalization costs. These associations persisted with propensity score-based analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, transfer status was associated with similar in-hospital mortality but higher complication rates, greater use of additional tMCS, and increased resource utilization.

JACC AdvancesVol. 5(5)
Saint Luke's Hospital (US), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.