China’s and Russia’s plans for a new world order and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization

This article looks at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) from a structural-realist perspective, trying to understand how the organization’s current major actors China and Russia as well as India manage their relationship within this organization and how they go about relating to the minor states of Central Asia and beyond as members, dialogue partners, or observers. The article argues that the deficiencies often attributed to the SCO cannot be overcome as long as its major actors do not yet agree on how to distribute power among themselves. It tests the hypothesis that the SCO as a multilateral organization – whose rules of the game are not defined by the United States and its allies – gives us an indication as to how its major actors envisage the future world order. Three main characteristics – triangularity, hierarchy, and consensus – regulate the distribution of power in the SCO and also guide the imagination of China, Russia, and India in the making of a new world order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Information
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203x261440470
Primary Topic
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China’s and Russia’s plans for a new world order and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization

Susanne Weigelin‐Schwiedrzik
China Information
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
article

China’s and Russia’s plans for a new world order and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization

Susanne Weigelin‐Schwiedrzik
article en

Abstract

This article looks at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) from a structural-realist perspective, trying to understand how the organization’s current major actors China and Russia as well as India manage their relationship within this organization and how they go about relating to the minor states of Central Asia and beyond as members, dialogue partners, or observers. The article argues that the deficiencies often attributed to the SCO cannot be overcome as long as its major actors do not yet agree on how to distribute power among themselves. It tests the hypothesis that the SCO as a multilateral organization – whose rules of the game are not defined by the United States and its allies – gives us an indication as to how its major actors envisage the future world order. Three main characteristics – triangularity, hierarchy, and consensus – regulate the distribution of power in the SCO and also guide the imagination of China, Russia, and India in the making of a new world order.

China Information
University of Vienna (AT)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.