Progressive Resistance Training versus Moderate-Intensity Aerobic Exercise for Glycaemic Control, Skeletal Muscle Mass, Insulin Sensitivity, and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects over 101 million adults in India, constituting the world's largest absolute diabetes burden, with exercise therapy representing an underutilised yet evidence-supported pillar of glycaemic management alongside pharmacological intervention. While aerobic exercise is the traditional guideline-endorsed exercise modality for T2DM, progressive resistance training (PRT) offers mechanistically distinct pathways to glycaemic improvement through skeletal muscle glucose transporter (GLUT4) upregulation, increased insulin-independent glucose disposal via skeletal muscle mass accretion, and enhanced basal metabolic rate. Comparative evidence from well-powered trials in the Indian population — who demonstrate the 'thin-fat' phenotype characterised by low muscle mass and high adiposity at moderate BMI — is lacking. This sixteen-week randomised controlled trial enrolled 280 adults with T2DM (aged 35–65 years, HbA1c 7.0–10.0%) across three JIPMER-affiliated diabetes clinics in Puducherry and Tamil Nadu, randomised to Progressive Resistance Training (PRT, n=95), Moderate-Intensity Aerobic Exercise (MIAE, n=95), or Combined PRT plus MIAE (COMB, n=90). The COMB group achieved the greatest HbA1c reduction (−1.6%, p<0.001) and combined skeletal muscle index improvement (+1.4 kg/m²) with fat mass reduction (−4.8%). PRT alone produced superior skeletal muscle mass gains (+1.8 kg lean mass) and HOMA-IR improvement (−2.4 units) compared to MIAE alone, while MIAE achieved greater VO₂max improvement (+6.8 mL/kg/min). These results challenge the aerobic-exercise primacy in T2DM guidelines and support PRT as an equally effective and potentially more appropriate exercise modality for the low muscle mass Indian diabetic phenotype.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19682025
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Progressive Resistance Training versus Moderate-Intensity Aerobic Exercise for Glycaemic Control, Skeletal Muscle Mass, Insulin Sensitivity, and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Meenakshi Sundaram Pillai, . Rajesh Gopinathan, Lakshmi Narayanan
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Progressive Resistance Training versus Moderate-Intensity Aerobic Exercise for Glycaemic Control, Skeletal Muscle Mass, Insulin Sensitivity, and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Meenakshi Sundaram Pillai, . Rajesh Gopinathan, Lakshmi Narayanan
article en

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects over 101 million adults in India, constituting the world's largest absolute diabetes burden, with exercise therapy representing an underutilised yet evidence-supported pillar of glycaemic management alongside pharmacological intervention. While aerobic exercise is the traditional guideline-endorsed exercise modality for T2DM, progressive resistance training (PRT) offers mechanistically distinct pathways to glycaemic improvement through skeletal muscle glucose transporter (GLUT4) upregulation, increased insulin-independent glucose disposal via skeletal muscle mass accretion, and enhanced basal metabolic rate. Comparative evidence from well-powered trials in the Indian population — who demonstrate the 'thin-fat' phenotype characterised by low muscle mass and high adiposity at moderate BMI — is lacking. This sixteen-week randomised controlled trial enrolled 280 adults with T2DM (aged 35–65 years, HbA1c 7.0–10.0%) across three JIPMER-affiliated diabetes clinics in Puducherry and Tamil Nadu, randomised to Progressive Resistance Training (PRT, n=95), Moderate-Intensity Aerobic Exercise (MIAE, n=95), or Combined PRT plus MIAE (COMB, n=90). The COMB group achieved the greatest HbA1c reduction (−1.6%, p<0.001) and combined skeletal muscle index improvement (+1.4 kg/m²) with fat mass reduction (−4.8%). PRT alone produced superior skeletal muscle mass gains (+1.8 kg lean mass) and HOMA-IR improvement (−2.4 units) compared to MIAE alone, while MIAE achieved greater VO₂max improvement (+6.8 mL/kg/min). These results challenge the aerobic-exercise primacy in T2DM guidelines and support PRT as an equally effective and potentially more appropriate exercise modality for the low muscle mass Indian diabetic phenotype.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Progressive Resistance Training versus Moderate-Intensity Aerobic Exercise for Glycaemic Control, Skeletal Muscle Mass, Insulin Sensitivity, and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus — Meenakshi Sundaram Pillai, . Rajesh Gopinathan, Lakshmi Narayanan · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS