Corporate Sustainability: Uneven <scp>ESG</scp> Maturity and Disclosure in Russia

ABSTRACT Sustainability has become central to corporate strategy, yet firms still differ markedly in the breadth and maturity of ESG disclosure. This study examines what explains variation in ESG disclosure breadth across large Russian firms in the 2022 reporting period. Using an open dataset of 109 companies and publicly available nonfinancial reports, we assess aggregate and pillar‐specific disclosure patterns across environmental, social, and governance dimensions. The analysis combines descriptive benchmarking, firm‐level case interpretation, and regression modeling controlling for headcount, revenue, and sector. The results show pronounced unevenness in ESG maturity and transparency. Organizational scale, measured by employee headcount, is the most consistent predictor of disclosure breadth, whereas revenue is not significant and sector effects are generally weak, except for limited governance‐related differences. The findings suggest that ESG institutionalization in Russia is driven more by internal organizational capacity than by sectoral pressures alone. The study highlights persistent disclosure gaps and points to the need for targeted support instruments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70617
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate Sustainability: Uneven ESG Maturity and Disclosure in Russia

Guzalbegim Rakhimova, Hatidje Nasirova, Jasurbek Namozov, Evgeny Kuzmin
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Corporate Sustainability: Uneven ESG Maturity and Disclosure in Russia

Guzalbegim Rakhimova, Hatidje Nasirova, Jasurbek Namozov, Evgeny Kuzmin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sustainability has become central to corporate strategy, yet firms still differ markedly in the breadth and maturity of ESG disclosure. This study examines what explains variation in ESG disclosure breadth across large Russian firms in the 2022 reporting period. Using an open dataset of 109 companies and publicly available nonfinancial reports, we assess aggregate and pillar‐specific disclosure patterns across environmental, social, and governance dimensions. The analysis combines descriptive benchmarking, firm‐level case interpretation, and regression modeling controlling for headcount, revenue, and sector. The results show pronounced unevenness in ESG maturity and transparency. Organizational scale, measured by employee headcount, is the most consistent predictor of disclosure breadth, whereas revenue is not significant and sector effects are generally weak, except for limited governance‐related differences. The findings suggest that ESG institutionalization in Russia is driven more by internal organizational capacity than by sectoral pressures alone. The study highlights persistent disclosure gaps and points to the need for targeted support instruments.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers (UZ), Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Institute of Economics (RU), Institute for Regional Economics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.