Modeling and prediction of air conditioning condensate generation: Experimental validation and environmental benefits

Air conditioning condensate is a valuable source of water and chilled energy. This study presents an analytical model, experimental validation, and machine learning-based prediction of condensate generation. The models were developed using a dataset of 17,500 data points from air conditioning systems with cooling capacities of 25 TR (tons of refrigeration) and 50 TR, under varying latent heat loads (25% and 35%) and fresh air ventilation rates (10% and 25%). The input parameters included outdoor weather conditions, cooling capacity, latent heat load, and fresh air ventilation. The analytical model was validated against a 33 TR, showing a relative error below 10% and a coefficient of determination of 0.95. The dataset was further used to predict condensate generation with multiple machine learning models, including artificial neural networks, support vector regression, gradient boosting, extreme gradient boosting, and random forest. Among these, the random forest model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, followed by extreme gradient boosting, with ensemble-based approaches outperforming other models. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis identified cooling capacity as the dominant factor influencing condensate prediction. Experimental validation of the random forest model confirmed its accuracy, with an error margin below 6 % and a coefficient of determination of 0.98. The life cycle impact assessment revealed that condensate recovery from 10–50 TR AC systems can save 11.77–68.37 kWh/day of electricity in coal-based power generation and 4.2–13.7 kWh/day through chilled water equivalence, demonstrating significant potential for environmental impact reduction. • Air-conditioning (AC) condensate is a potential resource for water and energy. • Condensate generation modeled using analytical and data-driven approaches. • Heat load increase from 25% to 35% raises condensate generation by 30–33%. • Random forest model showed the highest prediction accuracy among other models. • Life cycle assessment shows AC condensate recovery reduces environmental impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2026.108086
Primary Topic
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling and prediction of air conditioning condensate generation: Experimental validation and environmental benefits

Palanisamy Dhamodharan, Gyu Sang Choi, Rajendran Prabakaran, T. Mohanraj et al.
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
article

Modeling and prediction of air conditioning condensate generation: Experimental validation and environmental benefits

Palanisamy Dhamodharan, Gyu Sang Choi, Rajendran Prabakaran, T. Mohanraj, Sung Youn Kim, Santhoshkumar Annamalai
article en

Abstract

Air conditioning condensate is a valuable source of water and chilled energy. This study presents an analytical model, experimental validation, and machine learning-based prediction of condensate generation. The models were developed using a dataset of 17,500 data points from air conditioning systems with cooling capacities of 25 TR (tons of refrigeration) and 50 TR, under varying latent heat loads (25% and 35%) and fresh air ventilation rates (10% and 25%). The input parameters included outdoor weather conditions, cooling capacity, latent heat load, and fresh air ventilation. The analytical model was validated against a 33 TR, showing a relative error below 10% and a coefficient of determination of 0.95. The dataset was further used to predict condensate generation with multiple machine learning models, including artificial neural networks, support vector regression, gradient boosting, extreme gradient boosting, and random forest. Among these, the random forest model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, followed by extreme gradient boosting, with ensemble-based approaches outperforming other models. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis identified cooling capacity as the dominant factor influencing condensate prediction. Experimental validation of the random forest model confirmed its accuracy, with an error margin below 6 % and a coefficient of determination of 0.98. The life cycle impact assessment revealed that condensate recovery from 10–50 TR AC systems can save 11.77–68.37 kWh/day of electricity in coal-based power generation and 4.2–13.7 kWh/day through chilled water equivalence, demonstrating significant potential for environmental impact reduction. • Air-conditioning (AC) condensate is a potential resource for water and energy. • Condensate generation modeled using analytical and data-driven approaches. • Heat load increase from 25% to 35% raises condensate generation by 30–33%. • Random forest model showed the highest prediction accuracy among other models. • Life cycle assessment shows AC condensate recovery reduces environmental impacts.

Case Studies in Thermal EngineeringVol. 82
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Yeungnam University (KR), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN), Saveetha University (IN)
Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.