Exploring how and why people who drink alcohol at high-risk levels use alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks when cutting down: a qualitative focus group study

Abstract Background Alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks are becoming increasingly popular in high-income countries. However, there is limited evidence on their use among general population samples. Drawing on social practice theory, this study aimed to examine how and why people who drink at high-risk levels embed alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks into their everyday practices when trying to reduce their alcohol consumption. Methods Four online focus groups were conducted with a total of 31 adults from England and Scotland who had made at least one attempt to reduce their high-risk alcohol consumption in the previous 12 months. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, and a mixture of deductive and inductive coding strategies. Results Three overarching approaches emerged. The first was adopted by participants who mostly consumed soft drinks at home but found the material resemblance between alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks and standard alcoholic drinks allowed them to replicate drinking rituals in social events outside the home, evoking meanings of friendship, belonging, celebration and fun. The second approach involved participants who integrated alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks into routine practices at home (e.g. watching TV, reading), but struggled with diverse pressures to consume alcohol during socially-driven or intoxication-oriented practices. The third approach involved participants who found alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks conflicted with their established drinking practices and perceived them as ‘bad value’ due to their lack of alcohol, poor taste and high cost. Conclusion Use of alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks in attempts to reduce alcohol consumption may operate differently across the population depending on perceptions of their material properties and their fit with key elements of individuals’ pre-existing drinking practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-29230-y
Primary Topic
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring how and why people who drink alcohol at high-risk levels use alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks when cutting down: a qualitative focus group study

Rachel O’Donnell, Inge Kersbergen, Laura Fenton, John Holmes et al.
BMC Public Health
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
article

Exploring how and why people who drink alcohol at high-risk levels use alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks when cutting down: a qualitative focus group study

Rachel O’Donnell, Inge Kersbergen, Laura Fenton, John Holmes, Parvati Perman-Howe, Zoe Clarke, Rebecca Howell
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks are becoming increasingly popular in high-income countries. However, there is limited evidence on their use among general population samples. Drawing on social practice theory, this study aimed to examine how and why people who drink at high-risk levels embed alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks into their everyday practices when trying to reduce their alcohol consumption. Methods Four online focus groups were conducted with a total of 31 adults from England and Scotland who had made at least one attempt to reduce their high-risk alcohol consumption in the previous 12 months. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, and a mixture of deductive and inductive coding strategies. Results Three overarching approaches emerged. The first was adopted by participants who mostly consumed soft drinks at home but found the material resemblance between alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks and standard alcoholic drinks allowed them to replicate drinking rituals in social events outside the home, evoking meanings of friendship, belonging, celebration and fun. The second approach involved participants who integrated alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks into routine practices at home (e.g. watching TV, reading), but struggled with diverse pressures to consume alcohol during socially-driven or intoxication-oriented practices. The third approach involved participants who found alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks conflicted with their established drinking practices and perceived them as ‘bad value’ due to their lack of alcohol, poor taste and high cost. Conclusion Use of alcohol-free and low-alcohol drinks in attempts to reduce alcohol consumption may operate differently across the population depending on perceptions of their material properties and their fit with key elements of individuals’ pre-existing drinking practices.

BMC Public Health
University of Stirling (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Public Health Research Programme, School for Public Health Research
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.