Integrating Interval Agreement Approach (IAA) with TOPSIS in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making (MCGDM)

This paper presents a proposed method to integrate Interval Agreement Approach (IAA) with Technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) for Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making (MCGDM). The proposed method utilises IAA to model the preferences (word) given by decision maker in the initial step of TOPSIS-MCGDM. In real world, problems preferences may be given as imprecise or incomplete information. An issue has been raised about how to precisely modelling the preferences or word in the context of MCGDM. One of the strengths in IAA technique during the modelling process is it distinguished the two types of uncertainties (intra- and inter-) in different degree of freedom. The proposed method is able to capture the information from one or more intervals (with crisp or uncertain interval endpoints) associated with preferences given by the decision maker. This paper provides an example to illustrate the application of the proposed model.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Engineering & Technology
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.28.23412
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Interval Agreement Approach (IAA) with TOPSIS in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making (MCGDM)

Elissa Nadia Madi, Binyamin Yusoff
International Journal of Engineering & Technology
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Integrating Interval Agreement Approach (IAA) with TOPSIS in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making (MCGDM)

Elissa Nadia Madi, Binyamin Yusoff
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a proposed method to integrate Interval Agreement Approach (IAA) with Technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) for Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making (MCGDM). The proposed method utilises IAA to model the preferences (word) given by decision maker in the initial step of TOPSIS-MCGDM. In real world, problems preferences may be given as imprecise or incomplete information. An issue has been raised about how to precisely modelling the preferences or word in the context of MCGDM. One of the strengths in IAA technique during the modelling process is it distinguished the two types of uncertainties (intra- and inter-) in different degree of freedom. The proposed method is able to capture the information from one or more intervals (with crisp or uncertain interval endpoints) associated with preferences given by the decision maker. This paper provides an example to illustrate the application of the proposed model.

International Journal of Engineering & TechnologyVol. 7(3.28)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrating Interval Agreement Approach (IAA) with TOPSIS in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making (MCGDM) — Elissa Nadia Madi, Binyamin Yusoff · International Journal of Engineering & Technology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS