Modified Maddocks Questions Tool in Spanish: evaluating comprehension among child soccer players aged 4–8

Introduction: The Modified Maddocks Questions Tool (MMQT) is part of the Concussion Recognition Protocol used for sideline assessment of suspected concussion. Although widely used in English-speaking populations, it has not been validated in Spanish-speaking children. This study aimed to evaluate comprehension and response accuracy of a Spanish-adapted MMQT in soccer players aged 4-8 years. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study in Montevideo, Uruguay, between July and October 2024. Eighty-eight male soccer players aged 4-8 years were assessed at halftime using a Spanish-adapted version of the MMQT. Comprehension was evaluated by asking participants to reformulate each question. Associations between age, comprehension, and response accuracy were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and logistic regression models. Results: No statistically significant association was found between age and either comprehension or accuracy. Overall comprehension exceeded 96%. However, Question 4 ("Which team won the last match?") consistently showed a lower correct response rate across all ages. Our findings reinforce previous observations showing that questions assessing recall of past events can be challenging for younger children and suggest caution when evaluating MMQT responses in this age group. Conclusions: The Spanish-adapted MMQT demonstrates high comprehension and may be suitable for sideline concussion screening in children aged 5-8 years. However, Question 4 appears less reliable and should be reconsidered in future versions. A conservative approach is recommended, whereby any incorrect response warrants removal from play for further evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2026.1793910
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modified Maddocks Questions Tool in Spanish: evaluating comprehension among child soccer players aged 4–8

Federico Baltar, Pedro Piccardo, Santiago Mansilla, Alcy Torres et al.
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Modified Maddocks Questions Tool in Spanish: evaluating comprehension among child soccer players aged 4–8

Federico Baltar, Pedro Piccardo, Santiago Mansilla, Alcy Torres, Florencia Pérez‐Vidarte, Camila Blanco, Ailin Collazo, Gabriela Sosa, Agustín Figueira, Juliana Meyer
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The Modified Maddocks Questions Tool (MMQT) is part of the Concussion Recognition Protocol used for sideline assessment of suspected concussion. Although widely used in English-speaking populations, it has not been validated in Spanish-speaking children. This study aimed to evaluate comprehension and response accuracy of a Spanish-adapted MMQT in soccer players aged 4-8 years. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study in Montevideo, Uruguay, between July and October 2024. Eighty-eight male soccer players aged 4-8 years were assessed at halftime using a Spanish-adapted version of the MMQT. Comprehension was evaluated by asking participants to reformulate each question. Associations between age, comprehension, and response accuracy were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and logistic regression models. Results: No statistically significant association was found between age and either comprehension or accuracy. Overall comprehension exceeded 96%. However, Question 4 ("Which team won the last match?") consistently showed a lower correct response rate across all ages. Our findings reinforce previous observations showing that questions assessing recall of past events can be challenging for younger children and suggest caution when evaluating MMQT responses in this age group. Conclusions: The Spanish-adapted MMQT demonstrates high comprehension and may be suitable for sideline concussion screening in children aged 5-8 years. However, Question 4 appears less reliable and should be reconsidered in future versions. A conservative approach is recommended, whereby any incorrect response warrants removal from play for further evaluation.

Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingVol. 8
Boston Medical Center (US), Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY)
Universidad de la República Uruguay
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.