Enabling time-aware treatment plan evaluation for clinical proton pencil beam scanning systems.

Introduction Clinical Treatment Planning Systems (TPS) for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) typically do not consider treatment delivery time, limiting advanced applications like FLASH therapy, 4D dose calculation, and in vivo verification that depend on accurate temporal modeling. We developed a machine-learning framework to predict machine-specific delivery timing using only standard DICOM-RT plan data. Methods A component-based model (predicting spot delivery, spot transition, and layer switch times) was developed using Random Forest regressors. The framework was trained on machine log files and validated on two distinct systems: an IBA ProteusPlus and a Varian ProBeam, incorporating machine-specific pre-processing to handle proprietary logic like spot reordering. Results The models achieved high accuracy for spot delivery (R2 > 0.98) and spot transition (R2 > 0.95) time prediction on both systems. Energy layer switching time was the primary source of error, leading to an underestimation of total field time (∼3-5%). Despite this, Gamma analysis for predicted dose rate maps against log-file-based maps showed excellent agreement, with pass rates consistently meeting or exceeding 97% (0.5%/2mm criteria). Conclusions This work validates a robust, adaptable framework for predicting PBS delivery timing. By enabling time-aware plan evaluation, this model provides the foundation for optimizing treatment efficiency and enabling next-generation, dose-rate-dependent treatment modalities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/97140
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enabling time-aware treatment plan evaluation for clinical proton pencil beam scanning systems.

Javier Burguete, Artūrs Meijers, Pietro Pisciotta, Antje-Christin Knopf et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Enabling time-aware treatment plan evaluation for clinical proton pencil beam scanning systems.

Javier Burguete, Artūrs Meijers, Pietro Pisciotta, Antje-Christin Knopf, Marvin Nick Reimold, Francesco Fracchiolla, Wei Zou
article en

Abstract

Introduction Clinical Treatment Planning Systems (TPS) for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) typically do not consider treatment delivery time, limiting advanced applications like FLASH therapy, 4D dose calculation, and in vivo verification that depend on accurate temporal modeling. We developed a machine-learning framework to predict machine-specific delivery timing using only standard DICOM-RT plan data. Methods A component-based model (predicting spot delivery, spot transition, and layer switch times) was developed using Random Forest regressors. The framework was trained on machine log files and validated on two distinct systems: an IBA ProteusPlus and a Varian ProBeam, incorporating machine-specific pre-processing to handle proprietary logic like spot reordering. Results The models achieved high accuracy for spot delivery (R2 > 0.98) and spot transition (R2 > 0.95) time prediction on both systems. Energy layer switching time was the primary source of error, leading to an underestimation of total field time (∼3-5%). Despite this, Gamma analysis for predicted dose rate maps against log-file-based maps showed excellent agreement, with pass rates consistently meeting or exceeding 97% (0.5%/2mm criteria). Conclusions This work validates a robust, adaptable framework for predicting PBS delivery timing. By enabling time-aware plan evaluation, this model provides the foundation for optimizing treatment efficiency and enabling next-generation, dose-rate-dependent treatment modalities.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.