Structuring for success: how organizational design shapes infrastructure procurement performance

Purpose The infrastructure sector significantly influences economic growth and societal development. Procurement organization can therefore shape infrastructure procurement performance over both short and long time horizons. This study aims to examine how four structural variables, centralization (where procurement authority and responsibilities reside), specialization, participation and standardization, shape infrastructure procurement activities within public organizations. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a qualitative multiple-case study of nine Finnish municipalities, using 19 semi-structured interviews with infrastructure procurement actors and analysis of municipal strategy documents. Interview data were coded abductively and compared across cases. Findings This study identifies distinct operational and strategic performance effects associated with structural choices in procurement organization. The findings reveal differences in the relevance of structural variables depending on whether operational or strategic goals are pursued. Centralization supports operational procurement process effectiveness (e.g. procedural support and consistency), but it is less consistently linked with strategic performance in infrastructure procurement. By contrast, standardization and participation are closely connected to strategic performance, particularly through life-cycle integration across planning, construction and maintenance. The findings also indicate that structural variables operate through interdependencies rather than in isolation. Social implications The findings offer practical guidance to public infrastructure practitioners by highlighting the importance of structural design choices in procurement. Emphasizing strategic, life-cycle-oriented procurement can benefit public organizations, particularly within the infrastructure domain. Originality/value Research on procurement organization in local government has largely emphasized operational outcomes and centralization choices. This study distinguishes operational versus strategic performance effects of multiple structural variables in municipal infrastructure procurement and highlights participation as central to life-cycle-oriented procurement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Procurement
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jopp-07-2025-0073
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structuring for success: how organizational design shapes infrastructure procurement performance

Aki Jääskeläinen, Pier Paolo Patrucco, Kirsi K. Lindfors
Journal of Public Procurement
Public Procurement and Policy
article

Structuring for success: how organizational design shapes infrastructure procurement performance

Aki Jääskeläinen, Pier Paolo Patrucco, Kirsi K. Lindfors
article en

Abstract

Purpose The infrastructure sector significantly influences economic growth and societal development. Procurement organization can therefore shape infrastructure procurement performance over both short and long time horizons. This study aims to examine how four structural variables, centralization (where procurement authority and responsibilities reside), specialization, participation and standardization, shape infrastructure procurement activities within public organizations. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a qualitative multiple-case study of nine Finnish municipalities, using 19 semi-structured interviews with infrastructure procurement actors and analysis of municipal strategy documents. Interview data were coded abductively and compared across cases. Findings This study identifies distinct operational and strategic performance effects associated with structural choices in procurement organization. The findings reveal differences in the relevance of structural variables depending on whether operational or strategic goals are pursued. Centralization supports operational procurement process effectiveness (e.g. procedural support and consistency), but it is less consistently linked with strategic performance in infrastructure procurement. By contrast, standardization and participation are closely connected to strategic performance, particularly through life-cycle integration across planning, construction and maintenance. The findings also indicate that structural variables operate through interdependencies rather than in isolation. Social implications The findings offer practical guidance to public infrastructure practitioners by highlighting the importance of structural design choices in procurement. Emphasizing strategic, life-cycle-oriented procurement can benefit public organizations, particularly within the infrastructure domain. Originality/value Research on procurement organization in local government has largely emphasized operational outcomes and centralization choices. This study distinguishes operational versus strategic performance effects of multiple structural variables in municipal infrastructure procurement and highlights participation as central to life-cycle-oriented procurement.

Journal of Public Procurement
Tampere University of Applied Sciences (FI), Florida International University (US), Tampere University (FI)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Public Procurement and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.