Diagnostic performance of central vein sign and paramagnetic rim lesion integration for multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND: The central vein sign (CVS) and the paramagnetic rim lesion (PRL) are neuroimaging biomarkers of multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic performance of CVS and PRL integration in people presenting for initial diagnostic evaluation of MS. METHODS: Adults with clinical/radiological suspicion of MS, aged 18-65, with CVS and PRL assessment from the CentrAl Vein Sign in MS (CAVS-MS) pilot were included. Diagnostic performance of CVS and PRL combinations was evaluated, with 2017 McDonald criteria as the reference standard. RESULTS: = 46, 24 with MS), ⩾6 CVS and ⩾1 PRL diagnostic specificity was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.85, 1.00), similar to that of oligoclonal bands and dissemination in space by magnetic resonance imaging (0.82 [95% CI, 0.60, 0.95]). DISCUSSION: Integrating CVS and PRL represents potentially advantageous MS diagnostic biomarkers, with increased specificity and without substantial reduction in sensitivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585261434218
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic performance of central vein sign and paramagnetic rim lesion integration for multiple sclerosis

Eduardo Caverzasi, Léorah Freeman, Daniel Ontaneda, Daniel S. Reich et al.
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Diagnostic performance of central vein sign and paramagnetic rim lesion integration for multiple sclerosis

Eduardo Caverzasi, Léorah Freeman, Daniel Ontaneda, Daniel S. Reich, Brian Renner, Erin E. Longbrake, Melissa L. Martin, Lynn Daboul, Christina Azevedo, Matthew K. Schindler, Carly M. O’Donnell, Quy Cao, Karlo Toljan, Elias S. Sotirchos, Nancy L. Sicotte, Nico Papinutto, Kunio Nakamura, A Bar-Or, Pascal Sati, Rohini Samudralwar, Andrew J. Solomon, Roland G Henry, Paulo Henrique de Almeida Rodrigues, Russell T Shinohara, Jiwon Oh, Daniel Pelletier, Peter A Calabresi, Bruce A C Cree, John Derbyshire
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The central vein sign (CVS) and the paramagnetic rim lesion (PRL) are neuroimaging biomarkers of multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic performance of CVS and PRL integration in people presenting for initial diagnostic evaluation of MS. METHODS: Adults with clinical/radiological suspicion of MS, aged 18-65, with CVS and PRL assessment from the CentrAl Vein Sign in MS (CAVS-MS) pilot were included. Diagnostic performance of CVS and PRL combinations was evaluated, with 2017 McDonald criteria as the reference standard. RESULTS: = 46, 24 with MS), ⩾6 CVS and ⩾1 PRL diagnostic specificity was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.85, 1.00), similar to that of oligoclonal bands and dissemination in space by magnetic resonance imaging (0.82 [95% CI, 0.60, 0.95]). DISCUSSION: Integrating CVS and PRL represents potentially advantageous MS diagnostic biomarkers, with increased specificity and without substantial reduction in sensitivity.

Multiple Sclerosis Journal
University of Vermont (US), University of Southern California (US), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), St. Michael's Hospital (CA), National Institutes of Health (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Toronto (CA), University of Pavia (IT), Yale University (US), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US), National Institute of Mental Health (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Race to Erase MS, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.