Corequisite Learning in College Level Composition Courses

This study examined student learning outcomes in corequisite-supported and standalone entry-level English composition courses at an urban private college. Over two semesters, student achievement was assessed through analysis of pre- and post-test writing samples from 11 sections of the standalone course (N = 153) and 5 sections of the corequisite-supported course (N = 49) using a rubric aligned with program learning outcomes representing core writing competencies. Descriptive analyses revealed that students in the corequisite course entered with lower baseline proficiency yet demonstrated substantial progress across all rubric criteria by the end of the semester, achieving learning outcomes comparable to those in the standalone course. Course pass rates were high for both groups, and progression to subsequent English courses exceeded 80% across semesters. Findings highlight the effectiveness of a well-aligned corequisite model taught by the same instructor and underscore the importance of faculty continuity and assessment-driven course design. Keywords: assessment, corequisite, learning, course design

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61669/001c.161081
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corequisite Learning in College Level Composition Courses

Susan R. Waddington, Charlotte Kent, Allyson Richmond
Intersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Corequisite Learning in College Level Composition Courses

Susan R. Waddington, Charlotte Kent, Allyson Richmond
article en

Abstract

This study examined student learning outcomes in corequisite-supported and standalone entry-level English composition courses at an urban private college. Over two semesters, student achievement was assessed through analysis of pre- and post-test writing samples from 11 sections of the standalone course (N = 153) and 5 sections of the corequisite-supported course (N = 49) using a rubric aligned with program learning outcomes representing core writing competencies. Descriptive analyses revealed that students in the corequisite course entered with lower baseline proficiency yet demonstrated substantial progress across all rubric criteria by the end of the semester, achieving learning outcomes comparable to those in the standalone course. Course pass rates were high for both groups, and progression to subsequent English courses exceeded 80% across semesters. Findings highlight the effectiveness of a well-aligned corequisite model taught by the same instructor and underscore the importance of faculty continuity and assessment-driven course design. Keywords: assessment, corequisite, learning, course design

Intersection A Journal at the Intersection of Assessment and Learning
Montclair State University (US), CUNY School of Law (US), Sisters of Mercy Health System (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.