Management of bone defect and joint line restoration in revision total knee arthroplasty

Abstract Background: Bone stock reconstruction is one of the greatest difficulties while performing revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Joint line (JL) changes due to bone defects can affect the clinical outcome. Our study aimed to identify the rate and reasons leading to primary TKA failure and to evaluate the JL restoration using adequate augments in revision TKA patients with Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute Grade 2 bone defects. Materials and Methods: A total of 82 consecutive patients (88 knees), operated on with revision TKA between November 2013 and December 2023 at a single institution, were retrospectively reviewed. After excluding seven patients who lost follow-up, 75 patients (81 knees) were evaluated in the study. In terms of radiology, the JL position after initial and postrevision TKA was assessed and compared by Figgie’s method. Clinical evaluation was done with the Knee Society Scoring (KSS) system along with the final range of motion (ROM). Results: Postrevision TKA JL was found elevated in 22 knees and restored in 59 knees. The mean JL position increased from 16.08 mm prerevision to 19.80 mm postrevision, representing a mean elevation of 3.72 mm. ROM and knee function scores both significantly improved comparing postrevision to prerevision TKA ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: In cases of revision TKA, distal femoral augments of adequate thickness should be used often for bone loss reconstruction to effectively restore the JL position and improve clinical outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijhka.ijhka_21_25
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management of bone defect and joint line restoration in revision total knee arthroplasty

Ravikumar Mukartihal, Soujanya K. Wilson, Ketan J. Khatri, Sharan S. Patil
Indian Journal of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Management of bone defect and joint line restoration in revision total knee arthroplasty

Ravikumar Mukartihal, Soujanya K. Wilson, Ketan J. Khatri, Sharan S. Patil
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Bone stock reconstruction is one of the greatest difficulties while performing revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Joint line (JL) changes due to bone defects can affect the clinical outcome. Our study aimed to identify the rate and reasons leading to primary TKA failure and to evaluate the JL restoration using adequate augments in revision TKA patients with Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute Grade 2 bone defects. Materials and Methods: A total of 82 consecutive patients (88 knees), operated on with revision TKA between November 2013 and December 2023 at a single institution, were retrospectively reviewed. After excluding seven patients who lost follow-up, 75 patients (81 knees) were evaluated in the study. In terms of radiology, the JL position after initial and postrevision TKA was assessed and compared by Figgie’s method. Clinical evaluation was done with the Knee Society Scoring (KSS) system along with the final range of motion (ROM). Results: Postrevision TKA JL was found elevated in 22 knees and restored in 59 knees. The mean JL position increased from 16.08 mm prerevision to 19.80 mm postrevision, representing a mean elevation of 3.72 mm. ROM and knee function scores both significantly improved comparing postrevision to prerevision TKA ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: In cases of revision TKA, distal femoral augments of adequate thickness should be used often for bone loss reconstruction to effectively restore the JL position and improve clinical outcome.

Indian Journal of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
Sparsh Hospital (IN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.