Community forensic mental health services in England: mapping provision, structure and function

AIMS AND METHOD: Community forensic mental health services (CFMHS) in England were developed to reduce reliance on hospital care for this population, but provision varies. It is unclear whether standard setting work has increased consistency. Freedom of information requests were therefore sent to 50 National Health Service Trusts in England, to examine the population, staffing, treatment provision and organisation of CFMHS. RESULTS: Data were provided for 32 CFMHS, of which 59% were part of secure hospital-based services and 41% were standalone services working in parallel with general services. There was variation in aspects including professional composition, functions, the settings from where CFMHS accept referrals and long-term approach to patients subject to special restrictions under the Mental Health Act 1983. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: CFMHS continue to vary, especially in their interface with services other than forensic hospitals. This may impede standard setting and empirical evaluation. Different approaches to centralising oversight may be needed for standardisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BJPsych Bulletin
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2026.10236
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community forensic mental health services in England: mapping provision, structure and function

Daniel Whiting, John Tully, Marie Williams, Leah Wooster et al.
BJPsych Bulletin
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
article

Community forensic mental health services in England: mapping provision, structure and function

Daniel Whiting, John Tully, Marie Williams, Leah Wooster, Mark Taylor
article en

Abstract

AIMS AND METHOD: Community forensic mental health services (CFMHS) in England were developed to reduce reliance on hospital care for this population, but provision varies. It is unclear whether standard setting work has increased consistency. Freedom of information requests were therefore sent to 50 National Health Service Trusts in England, to examine the population, staffing, treatment provision and organisation of CFMHS. RESULTS: Data were provided for 32 CFMHS, of which 59% were part of secure hospital-based services and 41% were standalone services working in parallel with general services. There was variation in aspects including professional composition, functions, the settings from where CFMHS accept referrals and long-term approach to patients subject to special restrictions under the Mental Health Act 1983. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: CFMHS continue to vary, especially in their interface with services other than forensic hospitals. This may impede standard setting and empirical evaluation. Different approaches to centralising oversight may be needed for standardisation.

BJPsych Bulletin
University of Nottingham (GB), Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Community forensic mental health services in England: mapping provision, structure and function — Daniel Whiting, John Tully, et al. · BJPsych Bulletin (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS