The Seismic Response of Two Geotechnically Similar GRS-MB Walls During the Chi-Chi Earthquake: Insights from the Finite Displacement Method

This study re-examines two geologically and geotechnically similar geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with modular block facings (GRS-MBs) that exhibited markedly different seismic performances during the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake (ML = 7.3). Integrating a multi-wedge failure mechanism that captures soil–facing–reinforcement interactions with a nonlinear hyperbolic soil model representing shear stress–displacement behavior along the slip surface, the Force–equilibrium-based Finite Displacement Method (FFDM) provides consistent and robust displacement evaluations over a wide range of input seismic inertial forces. A systematic sensitivity investigation confirms that the FFDM framework responds to parameter variations in a physically meaningful manner, and that displacement predictions remain stable with respect to reasonable uncertainties in soil, reinforcement, and facing properties. The analysis clarifies why two similar GRS-MBs responded so differently during strong shaking and demonstrates the broader applicability of FFDM for displacement-based seismic assessment, including under shaking levels (e.g., kh ≈ 0.3) that would drive conventional limit–equilibrium calculations to Fs < 1.0, a physically impossible state requiring shear resistance greater than the soil’s ultimate strength. A comparative evaluation of seismic displacement predictions using the Newmark method and FFDM shows that FFDM successfully generates displacement-based seismic resisting curves and reproduces field-observed displacements. In contrast, the Newmark method yields order-of-magnitude variability in predicted movements and may be unsuitable for displacement-sensitive engineered slopes where deformations on the order of several 10−3–10−2 m are practically significant. For interaction-rich GRS-MBs with high values of khc, beyond the predictive capability of Newmark’s equation, FFDM offers a practical and physically grounded tool for seismic displacement assessment of reinforced soil structures.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geotechnics
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics6020039
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Seismic Response of Two Geotechnically Similar GRS-MB Walls During the Chi-Chi Earthquake: Insights from the Finite Displacement Method

Geotechnics
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

The Seismic Response of Two Geotechnically Similar GRS-MB Walls During the Chi-Chi Earthquake: Insights from the Finite Displacement Method

article en

Abstract

This study re-examines two geologically and geotechnically similar geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with modular block facings (GRS-MBs) that exhibited markedly different seismic performances during the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake (ML = 7.3). Integrating a multi-wedge failure mechanism that captures soil–facing–reinforcement interactions with a nonlinear hyperbolic soil model representing shear stress–displacement behavior along the slip surface, the Force–equilibrium-based Finite Displacement Method (FFDM) provides consistent and robust displacement evaluations over a wide range of input seismic inertial forces. A systematic sensitivity investigation confirms that the FFDM framework responds to parameter variations in a physically meaningful manner, and that displacement predictions remain stable with respect to reasonable uncertainties in soil, reinforcement, and facing properties. The analysis clarifies why two similar GRS-MBs responded so differently during strong shaking and demonstrates the broader applicability of FFDM for displacement-based seismic assessment, including under shaking levels (e.g., kh ≈ 0.3) that would drive conventional limit–equilibrium calculations to Fs < 1.0, a physically impossible state requiring shear resistance greater than the soil’s ultimate strength. A comparative evaluation of seismic displacement predictions using the Newmark method and FFDM shows that FFDM successfully generates displacement-based seismic resisting curves and reproduces field-observed displacements. In contrast, the Newmark method yields order-of-magnitude variability in predicted movements and may be unsuitable for displacement-sensitive engineered slopes where deformations on the order of several 10−3–10−2 m are practically significant. For interaction-rich GRS-MBs with high values of khc, beyond the predictive capability of Newmark’s equation, FFDM offers a practical and physically grounded tool for seismic displacement assessment of reinforced soil structures.

GeotechnicsVol. 6(2)
National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.