A HFMEA-driven Standardized Mobilization Protocol Reduces Adverse Events During Early Out-of-bed Activity in Neuro-ICU Patients: A Prospective Implementation Study

BACKGROUND: Early mobilization in neurocritical care may support neurological recovery but is often deferred because of concerns regarding hemodynamic instability, airway compromise, and device-related adverse events. Current ICU mobilization frameworks provide limited neurocritical-specific guidance, leading to practice variation and preventable safety risks. System-level risk-mitigation strategies are therefore required. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-center pre-post quality-improvement evaluation in a tertiary neurotrauma ICU. Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (HFMEA) mapped the baseline mobilization process into 25 subprocesses, identifying 60 potential failure modes. High-risk pathways informed development of a standardized workflow incorporating eligibility thresholds, graded activity progression, structured interdisciplinary handoff, airway and device securement, and real-time electronic safety reporting. Mobilization-related adverse events, ventilator-tubing dislodgement, and screening accuracy were compared between a 6-month pre-implementation and a 12-month post-implementation phase, analyzed at the session level. RESULTS: A total of 950 mobilization sessions were recorded pre-implementation and 781 post-implementation. Adverse-event rates decreased from 1.89% to 0.64% (relative risk: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.13-0.91; P =0.023), representing a 66.2% relative risk reduction. Ventilator-tubing dislodgement decreased from 0.42% to 0% (4/950 vs. 0/781). Eligibility-screening accuracy improved from 85% to 95% ( P <0.001). Structured handoff completion increased from 30% to 100%, and real-time electronic adverse-event reporting increased from 72% to 95%. CONCLUSIONS: An HFMEA-guided, standardized early-mobilization workflow reduced mobilization-related adverse events and improved process reliability in neurocritical care. Treating early mobilization as a safety-engineered process supports safer, more consistent ICU rehabilitation and provides a reproducible model for patient-safety improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient Safety
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000001508
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A HFMEA-driven Standardized Mobilization Protocol Reduces Adverse Events During Early Out-of-bed Activity in Neuro-ICU Patients: A Prospective Implementation Study

Yun-Chen Tsai, Chia‐Yu Chang, Guan-Shuo Pan, Shiou-Ying Chang et al.
Journal of Patient Safety
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

A HFMEA-driven Standardized Mobilization Protocol Reduces Adverse Events During Early Out-of-bed Activity in Neuro-ICU Patients: A Prospective Implementation Study

Yun-Chen Tsai, Chia‐Yu Chang, Guan-Shuo Pan, Shiou-Ying Chang, Hsiao-Ching Yen, Ting-Yuan Sheu, Wei-Ling Hsiao, Sheng-Che Chou
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early mobilization in neurocritical care may support neurological recovery but is often deferred because of concerns regarding hemodynamic instability, airway compromise, and device-related adverse events. Current ICU mobilization frameworks provide limited neurocritical-specific guidance, leading to practice variation and preventable safety risks. System-level risk-mitigation strategies are therefore required. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-center pre-post quality-improvement evaluation in a tertiary neurotrauma ICU. Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (HFMEA) mapped the baseline mobilization process into 25 subprocesses, identifying 60 potential failure modes. High-risk pathways informed development of a standardized workflow incorporating eligibility thresholds, graded activity progression, structured interdisciplinary handoff, airway and device securement, and real-time electronic safety reporting. Mobilization-related adverse events, ventilator-tubing dislodgement, and screening accuracy were compared between a 6-month pre-implementation and a 12-month post-implementation phase, analyzed at the session level. RESULTS: A total of 950 mobilization sessions were recorded pre-implementation and 781 post-implementation. Adverse-event rates decreased from 1.89% to 0.64% (relative risk: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.13-0.91; P =0.023), representing a 66.2% relative risk reduction. Ventilator-tubing dislodgement decreased from 0.42% to 0% (4/950 vs. 0/781). Eligibility-screening accuracy improved from 85% to 95% ( P <0.001). Structured handoff completion increased from 30% to 100%, and real-time electronic adverse-event reporting increased from 72% to 95%. CONCLUSIONS: An HFMEA-guided, standardized early-mobilization workflow reduced mobilization-related adverse events and improved process reliability in neurocritical care. Treating early mobilization as a safety-engineered process supports safer, more consistent ICU rehabilitation and provides a reproducible model for patient-safety improvement.

Journal of Patient Safety
National Taiwan University (TW), American Physical Therapy Association (US), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.