VASCADE MVP‐XL Versus VASCADE MVP for Large‐Bore Venous Access‐Site Closure in Electrophysiology Procedures: A Single‐Center Experience on Efficacy and Complications

INTRODUCTION: Vascular closure devices, used for the percutaneous closure of the femoral venous access-sites following electrophysiology (EP) procedures, are known to require shorter time to hemostasis compared to manual compression. The new VASCADE MVP_XL (Haemonetics Corp., USA) was designed for procedures utilizing large procedural sheaths, with a resorbable patch with 58% higher collagen content than the earlier VASCADE-MVP system, for better efficacy. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of VASCADE MVP-XL and VASCADE MVP in consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing procedures utilizing large sheaths (i.e. Farapulse pulsed-field ablation and left atrial appendage closure procedure). METHODS: Based on the device used to achieve access-site hemostasis, AF patients undergoing EP procedures were classified into group 1: MVP-XL (n = 151) and group 2: MVP (n = 423). The closure device was deployed under ultrasound guidance and included 2-4 min of gentle compression followed by approximately 2 h of bedrest. Fluoroscopy was used for proper positioning and accurate deployment of the collagen patch. All procedures were conducted under uninterrupted anticoagulation. The access-sites were examined immediately after the procedure, after the 2 h bed-rest and before discharge. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups except the procedure type (Watchman) and rivaroxaban use. Time to final sheath pull, time to ambulation and time to discharge were similar between the groups. Access-site bleeding occurred in 13 patients (3.1%) in the MVP group versus none (0%) in the MVP-XL group (p = 0.029). Time to hemostasis was significantly shorter in the MVP-XL group. CONCLUSION: VASCADE MVP-XL has a better safety and efficacy profile compared to the VASCADE-MVP system, especially in procedures involving large sheaths.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70348
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

VASCADE MVP‐XL Versus VASCADE MVP for Large‐Bore Venous Access‐Site Closure in Electrophysiology Procedures: A Single‐Center Experience on Efficacy and Complications

Carola Gianni, Amin Al‐Ahmad, Elio Zito, Giuseppe Stifano et al.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

VASCADE MVP‐XL Versus VASCADE MVP for Large‐Bore Venous Access‐Site Closure in Electrophysiology Procedures: A Single‐Center Experience on Efficacy and Complications

Carola Gianni, Amin Al‐Ahmad, Elio Zito, Giuseppe Stifano, Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia, Prem Geeta Torlapati, Emanuele Chiarazzo, J Allison, G J Gallinghouse, Weeranun Bode, Andrea Natale, Sanghamitra Mohanty, John D. Burkhardt, Angel Mayedo, Bryan MacDonald, Rodney Horton
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vascular closure devices, used for the percutaneous closure of the femoral venous access-sites following electrophysiology (EP) procedures, are known to require shorter time to hemostasis compared to manual compression. The new VASCADE MVP_XL (Haemonetics Corp., USA) was designed for procedures utilizing large procedural sheaths, with a resorbable patch with 58% higher collagen content than the earlier VASCADE-MVP system, for better efficacy. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of VASCADE MVP-XL and VASCADE MVP in consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing procedures utilizing large sheaths (i.e. Farapulse pulsed-field ablation and left atrial appendage closure procedure). METHODS: Based on the device used to achieve access-site hemostasis, AF patients undergoing EP procedures were classified into group 1: MVP-XL (n = 151) and group 2: MVP (n = 423). The closure device was deployed under ultrasound guidance and included 2-4 min of gentle compression followed by approximately 2 h of bedrest. Fluoroscopy was used for proper positioning and accurate deployment of the collagen patch. All procedures were conducted under uninterrupted anticoagulation. The access-sites were examined immediately after the procedure, after the 2 h bed-rest and before discharge. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups except the procedure type (Watchman) and rivaroxaban use. Time to final sheath pull, time to ambulation and time to discharge were similar between the groups. Access-site bleeding occurred in 13 patients (3.1%) in the MVP group versus none (0%) in the MVP-XL group (p = 0.029). Time to hemostasis was significantly shorter in the MVP-XL group. CONCLUSION: VASCADE MVP-XL has a better safety and efficacy profile compared to the VASCADE-MVP system, especially in procedures involving large sheaths.

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Milan (IT), St David's Medical Center (US), Scripps Clinic (US), Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia (US), MetroHealth Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.