Development and initial psychometric evaluation of a digital competence scale for kindergarten teachers in Western China

To develop and validate a scale assessing kindergarten teachers’ digital competence in ethnic minority areas of Western China amid growing ECEC digitalisation demands, where digital infrastructure, access to resources, and professional learning opportunities may be uneven. A total of 764 kindergarten teachers completed a 29-item instrument covering five domains: digital awareness, digital skills, digital application, digital social responsibility, and professional development. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α), Spearman–Brown split-half reliability, corrected item–total correlations, split-sample exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and known-groups comparisons were examined. The scale demonstrated excellent reliability (total α = 0.980; subscale αs = 0.895–0.969) and strong split-half reliability (total SB = 0.990; subscale SBs = 0.903–0.981). The structural analyses indicated that the theoretically specified five-factor model fit the data better than both three-factor and one-factor alternatives. Corrected item–total correlations were uniformly adequate, while the very high total reliability suggested some degree of item overlap. Known-groups comparisons also provided preliminary external validity evidence. The instrument provides a reliable, multidimensional tool for assessing ECEC teachers’ digital competence and can support diagnostic profiling and targeted professional development, particularly in under-resourced, culturally diverse, and regionally uneven early childhood contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04551-0
Primary Topic
Digital literacy in education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and initial psychometric evaluation of a digital competence scale for kindergarten teachers in Western China

Siyang Wei, 于蕙瑄, Huina Yu, Shuyu Huang et al.
BMC Psychology
Digital literacy in education
article

Development and initial psychometric evaluation of a digital competence scale for kindergarten teachers in Western China

Siyang Wei, 于蕙瑄, Huina Yu, Shuyu Huang, Tao Tian
article en

Abstract

To develop and validate a scale assessing kindergarten teachers’ digital competence in ethnic minority areas of Western China amid growing ECEC digitalisation demands, where digital infrastructure, access to resources, and professional learning opportunities may be uneven. A total of 764 kindergarten teachers completed a 29-item instrument covering five domains: digital awareness, digital skills, digital application, digital social responsibility, and professional development. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α), Spearman–Brown split-half reliability, corrected item–total correlations, split-sample exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and known-groups comparisons were examined. The scale demonstrated excellent reliability (total α = 0.980; subscale αs = 0.895–0.969) and strong split-half reliability (total SB = 0.990; subscale SBs = 0.903–0.981). The structural analyses indicated that the theoretically specified five-factor model fit the data better than both three-factor and one-factor alternatives. Corrected item–total correlations were uniformly adequate, while the very high total reliability suggested some degree of item overlap. Known-groups comparisons also provided preliminary external validity evidence. The instrument provides a reliable, multidimensional tool for assessing ECEC teachers’ digital competence and can support diagnostic profiling and targeted professional development, particularly in under-resourced, culturally diverse, and regionally uneven early childhood contexts.

BMC Psychology
Chengdu University (CN), Chengdu Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digital literacy in education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.