Practical recommendations for seborrheic dermatitis management: An expert consensus

To establish consensus-driven practical recommendations for the clinical management of Seborrheic Dermatitis (SD), covering both acute treatment and long-term maintenance strategies. We conducted a modified Delphi consensus involving 33 dermatology experts under the auspices of the EADV. The process utilized an efficient, two-round, blinded voting structure to iteratively refine an initial list of 84 evidence-based statements, facilitating a structured convergence of expert opinion. The iterative Delphi process proved effective in building consensus. After the second round of voting on a refined list of 68 statements, a final consensus was achieved for 44 statements, with near-consensus for another 6. This demonstrates the method's efficiency in harmonizing expert opinion on key clinical questions. This consensus delivers clear, clinically actionable recommendations for managing SD. The key clinical implications include prioritizing combined antifungal and anti-inflammatory strategies for both acute flares and long-term maintenance. Furthermore, the consensus provides a structured framework for therapeutic escalation to systemic agents in extensive or refractory cases, offering practical guidance where formal guidelines are lacking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.70444
Primary Topic
Nail Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical recommendations for seborrheic dermatitis management: An expert consensus

D. Ioannides, M A de Rie, M. Deleuran, O. Chosidow et al.
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Nail Diseases and Treatments
article

Practical recommendations for seborrheic dermatitis management: An expert consensus

D. Ioannides, M A de Rie, M. Deleuran, O. Chosidow, Paolo Gisondi, G.S. Tiplica, A. Kyrgidis, L. Naldi, the Delphi SD study experts, D. Tatsis
article en

Abstract

To establish consensus-driven practical recommendations for the clinical management of Seborrheic Dermatitis (SD), covering both acute treatment and long-term maintenance strategies. We conducted a modified Delphi consensus involving 33 dermatology experts under the auspices of the EADV. The process utilized an efficient, two-round, blinded voting structure to iteratively refine an initial list of 84 evidence-based statements, facilitating a structured convergence of expert opinion. The iterative Delphi process proved effective in building consensus. After the second round of voting on a refined list of 68 statements, a final consensus was achieved for 44 statements, with near-consensus for another 6. This demonstrates the method's efficiency in harmonizing expert opinion on key clinical questions. This consensus delivers clear, clinically actionable recommendations for managing SD. The key clinical implications include prioritizing combined antifungal and anti-inflammatory strategies for both acute flares and long-term maintenance. Furthermore, the consensus provides a structured framework for therapeutic escalation to systemic agents in extensive or refractory cases, offering practical guidance where formal guidelines are lacking.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
University of Verona (IT), Centro Studi GISED (IT), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Sorbonne Université (FR), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Ospedale San Bortolo (IT), Spitalul Clinic Colentina (RO), G. Papanikolaou General Hospital (GR), University of Amsterdam (NL)
European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Nail Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.