Polycentric Power Plays: Gulf Agency and the Dynamics of China’s AI Diplomacy

This article offers the first systematic, comparative analysis of China’s AI diplomacy across all six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states – Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates – foregrounding Gulf governments’ agency in negotiating the intersection of Chinese digital infrastructure and global AI governance. Challenging portrayals of the region as a monolithic or passive recipient of external influence, the study advances a polycentric negotiation framework that integrates theories of norm diffusion, strategic hedging, and co-production to reveal how Gulf states selectively absorb, filter, or recalibrate Chinese technological offerings and regulatory models. Drawing on systematic documentary analysis and comparative case studies, the research uncovers significant intra-GCC divergence: while some states exhibit high infrastructure dependence with limited normative alignment, others compartmentalize Chinese participation and prioritize regulatory convergence with Western frameworks. The findings highlight Gulf states’ strategic use of digital sovereignty and alignment flexibility to maximize autonomy amid intensifying US–China competition. Ultimately, the analysis demonstrates how Gulf agency and institutional innovation shape the global diffusion and localization of AI norms, providing a replicable model for understanding digital diplomacy in other geopolitical contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication and the Public
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473261438564
Primary Topic
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polycentric Power Plays: Gulf Agency and the Dynamics of China’s AI Diplomacy

Tariq Gulrez, Émilie Tran
Communication and the Public
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
article

Polycentric Power Plays: Gulf Agency and the Dynamics of China’s AI Diplomacy

Tariq Gulrez, Émilie Tran
article en

Abstract

This article offers the first systematic, comparative analysis of China’s AI diplomacy across all six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states – Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates – foregrounding Gulf governments’ agency in negotiating the intersection of Chinese digital infrastructure and global AI governance. Challenging portrayals of the region as a monolithic or passive recipient of external influence, the study advances a polycentric negotiation framework that integrates theories of norm diffusion, strategic hedging, and co-production to reveal how Gulf states selectively absorb, filter, or recalibrate Chinese technological offerings and regulatory models. Drawing on systematic documentary analysis and comparative case studies, the research uncovers significant intra-GCC divergence: while some states exhibit high infrastructure dependence with limited normative alignment, others compartmentalize Chinese participation and prioritize regulatory convergence with Western frameworks. The findings highlight Gulf states’ strategic use of digital sovereignty and alignment flexibility to maximize autonomy amid intensifying US–China competition. Ultimately, the analysis demonstrates how Gulf agency and institutional innovation shape the global diffusion and localization of AI norms, providing a replicable model for understanding digital diplomacy in other geopolitical contexts.

Communication and the Public
Qatar Financial Centre Authority (QA)
Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Socioeconomic Development in MENA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.