Predictors of patient treatment adherence and moderators of response for a randomized clinical trial comparing remote cognitive behavioral therapy approaches for high-impact chronic musculoskeletal pain

ABSTRACT: Remote cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions for chronic pain (CBT-CP-based) have consistently shown modest pain benefits. With remote treatment availability accelerating and increasingly tight healthcare resources, clinical decision-makers need to understand when working with a therapist may be beneficial vs a largely self-directed online program. Using data from a large-scale 3-arm pragmatic trial, we assessed the role of patient session adherence and potential moderators of intervention pain severity effectiveness for 2 remote CBT-CP-based approaches (online program [painTRAINER] and therapist-delivered telephone or video program [health coach]) and usual medical care. Of the prespecified moderators (demographics [sex, age, race/ethnicity, rurality], social determinants of health, and clinical variables [comorbid depression and/or anxiety, multiple types of chronic pain]), the health coach program was more effective than painTRAINER at 3 months among men and for those who screened positive for depression. No other factors moderated intervention pain severity effects at 3 or 12 months. The health coach program had higher session adherence than painTRAINER (70.4% vs 47.8%). Among intervention completers, pain severity outcomes were similar between CBT-CP-based interventions (Adjusted relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.99 [0.85-1.16] and 0.93 [0.82-1.05] at 3 and 12 months, respectively), suggesting that both interventions may be helpful for those with a variety of demographic and clinical characteristics if adherence is achieved. Participant engagement is critical in optimizing outcomes for online programs, but these findings suggest flexibility in the specific modality for delivering remote CBT-CP based on patient preference and healthcare system capacity that may enhance scalability and patient access to care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003971
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of patient treatment adherence and moderators of response for a randomized clinical trial comparing remote cognitive behavioral therapy approaches for high-impact chronic musculoskeletal pain

Morgan Justice, Meghan Mayhew, Lynn DeBar, Ashli Owen‐Smith et al.
Pain
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Predictors of patient treatment adherence and moderators of response for a randomized clinical trial comparing remote cognitive behavioral therapy approaches for high-impact chronic musculoskeletal pain

Morgan Justice, Meghan Mayhew, Lynn DeBar, Ashli Owen‐Smith, Andrea J. Cook, Robert Wellman, Christine Rini, Francis J. Keefe, Michael Von Korff, Benjamin H. Balderson
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Remote cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions for chronic pain (CBT-CP-based) have consistently shown modest pain benefits. With remote treatment availability accelerating and increasingly tight healthcare resources, clinical decision-makers need to understand when working with a therapist may be beneficial vs a largely self-directed online program. Using data from a large-scale 3-arm pragmatic trial, we assessed the role of patient session adherence and potential moderators of intervention pain severity effectiveness for 2 remote CBT-CP-based approaches (online program [painTRAINER] and therapist-delivered telephone or video program [health coach]) and usual medical care. Of the prespecified moderators (demographics [sex, age, race/ethnicity, rurality], social determinants of health, and clinical variables [comorbid depression and/or anxiety, multiple types of chronic pain]), the health coach program was more effective than painTRAINER at 3 months among men and for those who screened positive for depression. No other factors moderated intervention pain severity effects at 3 or 12 months. The health coach program had higher session adherence than painTRAINER (70.4% vs 47.8%). Among intervention completers, pain severity outcomes were similar between CBT-CP-based interventions (Adjusted relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.99 [0.85-1.16] and 0.93 [0.82-1.05] at 3 and 12 months, respectively), suggesting that both interventions may be helpful for those with a variety of demographic and clinical characteristics if adherence is achieved. Participant engagement is critical in optimizing outcomes for online programs, but these findings suggest flexibility in the specific modality for delivering remote CBT-CP based on patient preference and healthcare system capacity that may enhance scalability and patient access to care.

Pain
Northwestern University (US), Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US), Georgia State University (US), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.