Lifestyle intervention and cognitive outcomes in Down syndrome: a horizon 21 European Down syndrome consortium scoping review

Life expectancy for individuals with Down syndrome (DS) has significantly increased, primarily due to medical advances. While DS is considered a genetically determined form of Alzheimer’s disease (DS-AD), with neuropathological markers evident by age 40, the onset of clinical dementia varies. Modifiable risk factors are thought to contribute meaningfully to dementia risk in the general population. Advances in intervention studies in the general population suggest cognitive decline can be reduced through multimodal lifestyle interventions, however no large-scale multimodal studies have been conducted in the DS population. A comprehensive search was conducted across five electronic databases—Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ASSIA to identify studies that examined the relationship between lifestyle interventions and cognitive outcomes in adults with DS. The search combined database-specific controlled language with keywords related to exercise, diet, social activities, cardiovascular health, and brain stimulation. Studies included were peer-reviewed original research articles focusing on adults with DS and reported on cognitive outcomes or AD-related biomarkers. The search yielded 24,774 articles, with 16,868 remaining after duplicates were removed. A total of 44 articles met inclusion criteria across the domains of exercise, diet, cardiovascular health, social connectedness, and cognitive stimulation. Most studies focused on exercise, indicating some cognitive benefits, particularly in executive functions and working memory, though results were inconsistent, and many suggested the necessity of high adherence to intervention protocols. No studies were found that examined the direct impact of diet on cognition in DS. Findings on cognitive stimulation, cardiovascular health and social connectedness suggested potential but inconclusive benefits for cognitive function. This review underscores the significant gaps in research regarding non-pharmacological interventions for DS-AD. It highlights the need for tailored, well-structured studies to better understand and leverage potential cognitive benefits of lifestyle interventions in the DS population. Implementing such interventions early in life and before significant disease progression may help maintain quality of life and independence among individuals with DS. Future research should focus on comprehensive, multi-domain interventions to ascertain their efficacy and optimal application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-026-09694-0
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lifestyle intervention and cognitive outcomes in Down syndrome: a horizon 21 European Down syndrome consortium scoping review

Frode Larsen, Eimear McGlinchey, Ellen Melbye Langballe, Ann-Charlotte Granholm-Bentley et al.
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Lifestyle intervention and cognitive outcomes in Down syndrome: a horizon 21 European Down syndrome consortium scoping review

Frode Larsen, Eimear McGlinchey, Ellen Melbye Langballe, Ann-Charlotte Granholm-Bentley, Anna Stockbauer, Eleni Baldimtsi, Anne‐Sophie Rebillat, Fredrik Öhman, Katja Sandkühler, Wan Ming Khoo, Sarah Pape, Pierre Ecrement, Bessy Benejam, Mary McCarron, Andre Strydom, Shahid H. Zaman, Phoebe Ivain, Juan Fortea, Jessica Eustace-Cook, Johannes Levin, Georg Nübling
article en

Abstract

Life expectancy for individuals with Down syndrome (DS) has significantly increased, primarily due to medical advances. While DS is considered a genetically determined form of Alzheimer’s disease (DS-AD), with neuropathological markers evident by age 40, the onset of clinical dementia varies. Modifiable risk factors are thought to contribute meaningfully to dementia risk in the general population. Advances in intervention studies in the general population suggest cognitive decline can be reduced through multimodal lifestyle interventions, however no large-scale multimodal studies have been conducted in the DS population. A comprehensive search was conducted across five electronic databases—Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ASSIA to identify studies that examined the relationship between lifestyle interventions and cognitive outcomes in adults with DS. The search combined database-specific controlled language with keywords related to exercise, diet, social activities, cardiovascular health, and brain stimulation. Studies included were peer-reviewed original research articles focusing on adults with DS and reported on cognitive outcomes or AD-related biomarkers. The search yielded 24,774 articles, with 16,868 remaining after duplicates were removed. A total of 44 articles met inclusion criteria across the domains of exercise, diet, cardiovascular health, social connectedness, and cognitive stimulation. Most studies focused on exercise, indicating some cognitive benefits, particularly in executive functions and working memory, though results were inconsistent, and many suggested the necessity of high adherence to intervention protocols. No studies were found that examined the direct impact of diet on cognition in DS. Findings on cognitive stimulation, cardiovascular health and social connectedness suggested potential but inconclusive benefits for cognitive function. This review underscores the significant gaps in research regarding non-pharmacological interventions for DS-AD. It highlights the need for tailored, well-structured studies to better understand and leverage potential cognitive benefits of lifestyle interventions in the DS population. Implementing such interventions early in life and before significant disease progression may help maintain quality of life and independence among individuals with DS. Future research should focus on comprehensive, multi-domain interventions to ascertain their efficacy and optimal application.

Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Oslo University Hospital (NO), Medical University of South Carolina (US), King's College London (GB), University of Oslo (NO), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), University of Cambridge (GB), German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE), Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), Sykehuset i Vestfold (NO), Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (ES), Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (DE), Fondation Jérôme-Lejeune (FR), Global Brain Health Institute (US), Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (ES), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Health Research Board, Global Brain Health Institute, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno, National Institutes of Health, Medical Research Council, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.