Micro-Doppler Radar Identifies Movement Asymmetries After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Patients who have undergone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) have a 6-24% chance of either re-tearing or having subsequent knee surgery. To date there have been no practical validated risk prediction models that can be easily implemented into clinical workflow for re-injury risk. Micro-Doppler radar (MDR) provides a promising solution. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive ability of MDR to identify persons with a previous ACLR relative to an age and sex matched healthy control. Methods: ACLR patients (n=81) and controls (n=100) performed drop box jump, sit to stand (STS), and walking trials as MDR signatures were collected. A 1D Convolutional Neural Network was developed to evaluate each activity individually followed by the development of a fusion model validation using all three activities. Results: The STS model individually achieved the highest overall accuracy of 82.3%, with a sensitivity of 71.6% and specificity of 91.0%. The fusion model using all activities achieved a peak overall accuracy to detect ACLR of 86.2%, 80.3% sensitivity, and 91% specificity. Conclusions: Currently, there is no clinically validated, efficient approach to objectively evaluate human motion at the point of care. When coupled with machine learning, MDR accurately differentiates ACLR from control groups by identifying complex biomechanical asymmetries, with classification performance comparable to or exceeding that of motion capture. Future research is needed to determine if MDR can be used in conjunction with risk prediction modeling. Key points: Micro-Doppler radar provides a promising new solution to identify important human motion asymmetries in clinical settings. Here we evaluated a group of patients who have a history of Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction versus a control group. Simple movements performed in the presence of the micro-Doppler radar system were used to identify the 2 groups with accuracy comparable or superior to motion capture systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.15.26350397
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Micro-Doppler Radar Identifies Movement Asymmetries After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Jennifer E. Nyland, Cayce Onks, Terrence E. Murphy, Robert A. Creath et al.
medRxiv
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Micro-Doppler Radar Identifies Movement Asymmetries After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Jennifer E. Nyland, Cayce Onks, Terrence E. Murphy, Robert A. Creath, Cunhao Zeng, Ben D Simone, Alex M Wiggins, Ram M Narayanan, Veronica A Venezia, Blair R Shaffer, Bilal A Ardat, Leonard A Kishel
article en

Abstract

Background: Patients who have undergone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) have a 6-24% chance of either re-tearing or having subsequent knee surgery. To date there have been no practical validated risk prediction models that can be easily implemented into clinical workflow for re-injury risk. Micro-Doppler radar (MDR) provides a promising solution. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive ability of MDR to identify persons with a previous ACLR relative to an age and sex matched healthy control. Methods: ACLR patients (n=81) and controls (n=100) performed drop box jump, sit to stand (STS), and walking trials as MDR signatures were collected. A 1D Convolutional Neural Network was developed to evaluate each activity individually followed by the development of a fusion model validation using all three activities. Results: The STS model individually achieved the highest overall accuracy of 82.3%, with a sensitivity of 71.6% and specificity of 91.0%. The fusion model using all activities achieved a peak overall accuracy to detect ACLR of 86.2%, 80.3% sensitivity, and 91% specificity. Conclusions: Currently, there is no clinically validated, efficient approach to objectively evaluate human motion at the point of care. When coupled with machine learning, MDR accurately differentiates ACLR from control groups by identifying complex biomechanical asymmetries, with classification performance comparable to or exceeding that of motion capture. Future research is needed to determine if MDR can be used in conjunction with risk prediction modeling. Key points: Micro-Doppler radar provides a promising new solution to identify important human motion asymmetries in clinical settings. Here we evaluated a group of patients who have a history of Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction versus a control group. Simple movements performed in the presence of the micro-Doppler radar system were used to identify the 2 groups with accuracy comparable or superior to motion capture systems.

medRxiv
Pennsylvania State University (US), Lebanon Valley College (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.