Living the law: An ecological analysis of NGO responses to sex work governance

This article analyses the criminalisation of sex work as an ecological system of governance, sustained not only through statutory law but also through institutional mandates, funding logics, and cultural ideologies. Drawing on interviews with NGO practitioners in the United Kingdom and United States, and using ecological systems theory, we show how criminalisation operates through networked institutional relations. NGOs, as meso-level actors, mediate between sex-working clients and carceral systems, navigating data-sharing mandates, safeguarding protocols, and exclusionary eligibility rules. We introduce the concept of ‘cascading vulnerability’ to capture how these interactions can compound risk across ecological levels. Addressing structural exclusion requires engaging the broader architecture of governance, not statutory law alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social & Legal Studies
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639261441598
Primary Topic
Sex work and related issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Living the law: An ecological analysis of NGO responses to sex work governance

Graham Ellison, Erin Early, Barbara G. Brents, Jane Scoular et al.
Social & Legal Studies
Sex work and related issues
article

Living the law: An ecological analysis of NGO responses to sex work governance

Graham Ellison, Erin Early, Barbara G. Brents, Jane Scoular, Teela Sanders
article en

Abstract

This article analyses the criminalisation of sex work as an ecological system of governance, sustained not only through statutory law but also through institutional mandates, funding logics, and cultural ideologies. Drawing on interviews with NGO practitioners in the United Kingdom and United States, and using ecological systems theory, we show how criminalisation operates through networked institutional relations. NGOs, as meso-level actors, mediate between sex-working clients and carceral systems, navigating data-sharing mandates, safeguarding protocols, and exclusionary eligibility rules. We introduce the concept of ‘cascading vulnerability’ to capture how these interactions can compound risk across ecological levels. Addressing structural exclusion requires engaging the broader architecture of governance, not statutory law alone.

Social & Legal Studies
Queen's University Belfast (GB), University of Nevada, Reno (US), University of Ulster (GB), University of Leicester (GB), University of Strathclyde (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Sex work and related issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.