Examining mechanisms that facilitate and hinder multi-agency working in missing children’s investigations: An in-depth policing perspective

Despite recognition that multi-agency collaboration is vital in missing child investigations, coordination challenges persist. This study explores mechanisms that facilitate or hinder such collaboration from police perspectives, addressing theoretical and empirical gaps in existing research. Through thematic analysis of 23 interviews, eight mechanisms were identified: understanding useful intelligence, terminology, technology, policies, role boundaries, risk aversion, dedicated resources, and research needs. By applying inter-team theories such as Transactive Memory and Knowledge Boundaries, the study advances understanding of knowledge sharing in high-risk contexts, offering actionable, theoryinformed insights to strengthen coordination, policy, and practice in safeguarding vulnerable children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258x261445854
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Related Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining mechanisms that facilitate and hinder multi-agency working in missing children’s investigations: An in-depth policing perspective

Paige Monaghan, Susan Giles, Sara Waring, Freya O’Brien
The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles
Child Abuse and Related Trauma
article

Examining mechanisms that facilitate and hinder multi-agency working in missing children’s investigations: An in-depth policing perspective

Paige Monaghan, Susan Giles, Sara Waring, Freya O’Brien
article en

Abstract

Despite recognition that multi-agency collaboration is vital in missing child investigations, coordination challenges persist. This study explores mechanisms that facilitate or hinder such collaboration from police perspectives, addressing theoretical and empirical gaps in existing research. Through thematic analysis of 23 interviews, eight mechanisms were identified: understanding useful intelligence, terminology, technology, policies, role boundaries, risk aversion, dedicated resources, and research needs. By applying inter-team theories such as Transactive Memory and Knowledge Boundaries, the study advances understanding of knowledge sharing in high-risk contexts, offering actionable, theoryinformed insights to strengthen coordination, policy, and practice in safeguarding vulnerable children.

The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles
University of Liverpool (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Child Abuse and Related Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.