Preoperative Neurological Severity and Clinically Meaningful Recovery After Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine how preoperative neurological severity influences postoperative recovery and achievement of clinically meaningful improvement following anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF/ACCF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior cervical decompression procedures are widely used for DCM, including ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, with favorable outcomes reported over decades. However, the impact of preoperative neurological severity on recovery after anterior surgery remains insufficiently defined. Large anterior-only cohorts evaluating severity-adjusted minimal clinically important difference (MCID) are lacking. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1,024 patients who underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion at three spine centers between 2011 and 2021. Patients were stratified by preoperative JOA score into a severe group (JOA <10; n=320) and a mild-moderate group (JOA ≥10; n=704). Neurological outcomes were assessed using the JOA score, JOA recovery rate, and severity-specific MCID thresholds (≥3-point improvement for severe and ≥2-point improvement for mild-moderate myelopathy). Perioperative complications, including dysphagia, segmental motor deficit, and graft-related events, were recorded. RESULTS: Preoperative JOA scores were significantly lower in the severe group (7.4 ± 2.2) than in the mild-moderate group (12.4 ± 1.6; P<0.001). Both groups showed substantial improvement at 1 year (11.7 ± 3.1 vs. 14.6 ± 1.8; P<0.001). Recovery rates were similar (44.6% vs. 48.2%; P=0.74). MCID achievement was significantly higher in the severe group (66.9%) than in the mild-moderate group (49.0%; P<0.001). Excellent recovery (JOA recovery rate ≥80%) was more frequent in the mild-moderate group (23.4% vs. 12.5%; P<0.01). Complication rates did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: In this large multicenter cohort, patients with severe preoperative myelopathy achieved meaningful neurological improvement and high rates of severity-adjusted MCID after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. These findings provide practical, severity-based prognostic information for preoperative counseling in DCM surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spine
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000005728
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative Neurological Severity and Clinically Meaningful Recovery After Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

Yu Matsukura, Masaki Tomori, Kazuyuki Otani, Ichiro Torigoe et al.
Spine
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Preoperative Neurological Severity and Clinically Meaningful Recovery After Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

Yu Matsukura, Masaki Tomori, Kazuyuki Otani, Ichiro Torigoe, Kyohei Sakaki, K Yamada, Motonori Hashimoto, Hiroaki Onuma, Shigeo Shindo, Shuta Ushio, Hiroyuki Inose, Satoru Egawa, Yoshiyasu Arai, Kentaro Sakaeda, Tsuyoshi Yamada, Shingo Morishita, Kazuo Kusano, Jun Hashimoto, Akihiro Horiuchi, Yuji Komiya, Kenichiro Sakai, Toshitaka Yoshii, Takashi Hirai, Satoshi Tamura
article en

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine how preoperative neurological severity influences postoperative recovery and achievement of clinically meaningful improvement following anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF/ACCF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior cervical decompression procedures are widely used for DCM, including ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, with favorable outcomes reported over decades. However, the impact of preoperative neurological severity on recovery after anterior surgery remains insufficiently defined. Large anterior-only cohorts evaluating severity-adjusted minimal clinically important difference (MCID) are lacking. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1,024 patients who underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion at three spine centers between 2011 and 2021. Patients were stratified by preoperative JOA score into a severe group (JOA <10; n=320) and a mild-moderate group (JOA ≥10; n=704). Neurological outcomes were assessed using the JOA score, JOA recovery rate, and severity-specific MCID thresholds (≥3-point improvement for severe and ≥2-point improvement for mild-moderate myelopathy). Perioperative complications, including dysphagia, segmental motor deficit, and graft-related events, were recorded. RESULTS: Preoperative JOA scores were significantly lower in the severe group (7.4 ± 2.2) than in the mild-moderate group (12.4 ± 1.6; P<0.001). Both groups showed substantial improvement at 1 year (11.7 ± 3.1 vs. 14.6 ± 1.8; P<0.001). Recovery rates were similar (44.6% vs. 48.2%; P=0.74). MCID achievement was significantly higher in the severe group (66.9%) than in the mild-moderate group (49.0%; P<0.001). Excellent recovery (JOA recovery rate ≥80%) was more frequent in the mild-moderate group (23.4% vs. 12.5%; P<0.01). Complication rates did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: In this large multicenter cohort, patients with severe preoperative myelopathy achieved meaningful neurological improvement and high rates of severity-adjusted MCID after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. These findings provide practical, severity-based prognostic information for preoperative counseling in DCM surgery.

Spine
Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP), Kudanzaka Hospital (JP), Noguchi Hospital (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.