Effects of participatory organizational interventions on mental health and work performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: Participatory organizational interventions (POIs) may improve workers' mental health and work performance, but evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cluster-randomized controlled trials (cRCTs) remains limited: The meta-analysis has not been updated since 2015; a previous study focused on healthcare workers; and potential outcomes have not been adequately examined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of POIs on mental health and work performance among workers. METHODS: The current study searched PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and Japan Medical Abstracts Society for papers published by November 11, 2022. Eligible studies were cRCTs assessing the effects of POIs on mental health or work performance. The risks of bias were evaluated by using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for cRCTs and performed meta-analysis using a random effects model. RESULTS: Fourteen cRCTs were included in the systematic review, and eight cRCTs in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed non-significant beneficial effect on mental health conditions [the standardized mean differences (SMD) = -0.04, 95%CI; -0.10 to 0.03], positive mental health (SMD = -0.004, 95%CI; -0.077 to 0.068), and work performance (SMD = 0.01, 95%CI; -0.10 to 0.13). CONCLUSION: This study did not confirm that POIs had a statistically significant effect on mental health or work performance. However, several studies that reported favorable results tended to emphasize active and structured participation, alignment with workers' needs, and attention to organizational context. Further research is needed to identify the conditions under which the interventions are effective. Trial registration: The study protocol was registered at the UMIN registry (registration number: UMIN000049453).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational Health
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiag024
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of participatory organizational interventions on mental health and work performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Norito Kawakami, Emiko Ando, M. Iida, Yasumasa Otsuka et al.
Journal of Occupational Health
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Effects of participatory organizational interventions on mental health and work performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Norito Kawakami, Emiko Ando, M. Iida, Yasumasa Otsuka, Kanami Tsuno, Akihito Shimazu, Mai Iwanaga, Kazuto Kuribayashi, Akizumi Tsutsumi, Akiomi Inoue, Asuka Sakuraya, Reiko Inoue, Kazuhiro Watanabe, Ayako Hino, N SASAKI, Kotaro Imamura, Hiroki Asaoka, Yu Komase, Yuka Kobayashi, Takeshi Ebara, Hisashi Eguchi
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Participatory organizational interventions (POIs) may improve workers' mental health and work performance, but evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cluster-randomized controlled trials (cRCTs) remains limited: The meta-analysis has not been updated since 2015; a previous study focused on healthcare workers; and potential outcomes have not been adequately examined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of POIs on mental health and work performance among workers. METHODS: The current study searched PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and Japan Medical Abstracts Society for papers published by November 11, 2022. Eligible studies were cRCTs assessing the effects of POIs on mental health or work performance. The risks of bias were evaluated by using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for cRCTs and performed meta-analysis using a random effects model. RESULTS: Fourteen cRCTs were included in the systematic review, and eight cRCTs in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed non-significant beneficial effect on mental health conditions [the standardized mean differences (SMD) = -0.04, 95%CI; -0.10 to 0.03], positive mental health (SMD = -0.004, 95%CI; -0.077 to 0.068), and work performance (SMD = 0.01, 95%CI; -0.10 to 0.13). CONCLUSION: This study did not confirm that POIs had a statistically significant effect on mental health or work performance. However, several studies that reported favorable results tended to emphasize active and structured participation, alignment with workers' needs, and attention to organizational context. Further research is needed to identify the conditions under which the interventions are effective. Trial registration: The study protocol was registered at the UMIN registry (registration number: UMIN000049453).

Journal of Occupational Health
University of Tsukuba (JP), Chiba University (JP), University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan (JP), Hosei University (JP), Fujitsu (Japan) (JP), Tokyo Health Care University (JP), Keio University Shonan Fujisawa (JP), Fukushima Medical University Hospital (JP), National Institute of Mental Health (JP), Kitasato University (JP), Kanagawa University of Human Services (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.