CRITICAL-PROPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS OF LOGICAL SUBSTANTIVALISM: Hugang Cui's Track-Light Model in Confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents a critical–propositional examination of Hugang Cui’s Spacetime Substantivalism 0: The Track-Light Model — The Logic Matrix as the Universal Source, the Origin of the Cosmic Singularity, and a New Foundation for Metaphysics in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). Written from the modal, ontological, and cosmological perspective of TO, the study investigates the extent to which Cui’s Logical Matrix , generative meta-law, and account of matter, life, and consciousness can be considered compatible with the Seven Absolute Truths of the Theory of Objectivity. The article argues that Cui’s proposal is philosophically significant because it restores logical-ontological anteriority to the center of metaphysical reflection and seeks to overcome the mind-body dualism through a common source. At the same time, the study identifies decisive tensions between Cui’s logical substantivalism and the modal discipline of TO, especially regarding individuation, boundary lines, minimal relational observation, the role of infinity as non-element, and the need for a transcendent substance beyond the quantum domain. The text further articulates Cui’s model with the foundational bibliography of the Theory of Objectivity, its recent developments on modal ontology, testability, phenomenic elements, inductive effects, and cosmogonic structure, as well as with supporting works in philosophy, cosmology, consciousness studies, and artificial intelligence. The article concludes that Cui’s model should be regarded as a high-level logicist interlocutor: genuinely relevant to the philosophical aims of TO, yet only partially compatible with its full modal and cosmogonic framework. Editorial note: This analytical study benefited from the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Hugang Cui; Logical Matrix; Track-Light Model; logical substantivalism; modal ontology; cosmology; mind-body problem; consciousness studies; cosmogony; metaphysics; phenomenic elements; inductive effects; artificial intelligence; philosophy of physics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19679940
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CRITICAL-PROPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS OF LOGICAL SUBSTANTIVALISM: Hugang Cui's Track-Light Model in Confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
article

CRITICAL-PROPOSITIONAL ANALYSIS OF LOGICAL SUBSTANTIVALISM: Hugang Cui's Track-Light Model in Confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional examination of Hugang Cui’s Spacetime Substantivalism 0: The Track-Light Model — The Logic Matrix as the Universal Source, the Origin of the Cosmic Singularity, and a New Foundation for Metaphysics in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). Written from the modal, ontological, and cosmological perspective of TO, the study investigates the extent to which Cui’s Logical Matrix , generative meta-law, and account of matter, life, and consciousness can be considered compatible with the Seven Absolute Truths of the Theory of Objectivity. The article argues that Cui’s proposal is philosophically significant because it restores logical-ontological anteriority to the center of metaphysical reflection and seeks to overcome the mind-body dualism through a common source. At the same time, the study identifies decisive tensions between Cui’s logical substantivalism and the modal discipline of TO, especially regarding individuation, boundary lines, minimal relational observation, the role of infinity as non-element, and the need for a transcendent substance beyond the quantum domain. The text further articulates Cui’s model with the foundational bibliography of the Theory of Objectivity, its recent developments on modal ontology, testability, phenomenic elements, inductive effects, and cosmogonic structure, as well as with supporting works in philosophy, cosmology, consciousness studies, and artificial intelligence. The article concludes that Cui’s model should be regarded as a high-level logicist interlocutor: genuinely relevant to the philosophical aims of TO, yet only partially compatible with its full modal and cosmogonic framework. Editorial note: This analytical study benefited from the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Hugang Cui; Logical Matrix; Track-Light Model; logical substantivalism; modal ontology; cosmology; mind-body problem; consciousness studies; cosmogony; metaphysics; phenomenic elements; inductive effects; artificial intelligence; philosophy of physics.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.