On-Body and Off-Body Communications: A Comparative Study Between Hardware and Simulations

The IEEE 802.15.6 standard defines wireless body area networks (WBANs) for communication in, on, and around the human body. However, commercially available hardware platforms that support direct experimental validation of IEEE 802.15.6-oriented WBAN studies remain limited. As a result, much WBAN research still relies on simulations or custom-built transceivers, leaving the practical validity of simulation results uncertain. In this study, we evaluated a configurable radio platform for GMSK-based narrowband WBAN PHY validation in the 420-450 MHz band by comparing theoretical calculations, ns-3 simulation results, and hardware measurements. Evaluations covered both on-body and off-body scenarios at transmit powers from -15 to -25 dBm. Our key findings are as follows: (1) lower transmit power consistently decreases the communication range in both simulated and hardware environments; (2) degradation trends in packet success rate are similar for both environments, supporting simulation credibility; and (3) in the off-body scenario, ns-3 simulations overestimate the communication range by approximately 10 m compared to hardware under identical conditions. The publicly available simulation framework facilitates reproducible WBAN research. Our results confirm that our ns-3 implementation can be used effectively to approximate key GMSK-based WBAN PHY behaviors in realistic conditions while identifying specific differences in range estimates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26082561
Primary Topic
Wireless Body Area Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On-Body and Off-Body Communications: A Comparative Study Between Hardware and Simulations

Alberto Gallegos Ramonet, Taku Noguchi, Drishti Oza, Masami Yoshida
Sensors
Wireless Body Area Networks
article

On-Body and Off-Body Communications: A Comparative Study Between Hardware and Simulations

Alberto Gallegos Ramonet, Taku Noguchi, Drishti Oza, Masami Yoshida
article en

Abstract

The IEEE 802.15.6 standard defines wireless body area networks (WBANs) for communication in, on, and around the human body. However, commercially available hardware platforms that support direct experimental validation of IEEE 802.15.6-oriented WBAN studies remain limited. As a result, much WBAN research still relies on simulations or custom-built transceivers, leaving the practical validity of simulation results uncertain. In this study, we evaluated a configurable radio platform for GMSK-based narrowband WBAN PHY validation in the 420-450 MHz band by comparing theoretical calculations, ns-3 simulation results, and hardware measurements. Evaluations covered both on-body and off-body scenarios at transmit powers from -15 to -25 dBm. Our key findings are as follows: (1) lower transmit power consistently decreases the communication range in both simulated and hardware environments; (2) degradation trends in packet success rate are similar for both environments, supporting simulation credibility; and (3) in the off-body scenario, ns-3 simulations overestimate the communication range by approximately 10 m compared to hardware under identical conditions. The publicly available simulation framework facilitates reproducible WBAN research. Our results confirm that our ns-3 implementation can be used effectively to approximate key GMSK-based WBAN PHY behaviors in realistic conditions while identifying specific differences in range estimates.

SensorsVol. 26(8)
Ritsumeikan University (JP), Tokushima College of Technology (JP), Tokushima University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Wireless Body Area Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.