Implementing the Lung Donor (LUNDON) acceptability score in U.S. donor management and transplant decision-making: A multi-aim, mixed-methods protocol

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in transplantation science, a persistent shortage of donor lungs continues to limit access to life-saving lung transplants. The Lung Donor (LUNDON) Acceptability Score is a validated tool that predicts donor lung utilization and post-transplant recipient outcomes, but integration into practice remains limited. This study will evaluate determinants of LUNDON score adoption, its impact on clinical decision-making, and develop tools to support its implementation. METHODS: This is a multi-aim mixed-methods pre-implementation study that will be conducted across U.S. Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) and lung transplant centers. Aim 1 will identify barriers and facilitators of LUNDON score adoption through surveys (n = 242 participants) and interviews (n = 60 participants) of OPO and transplant providers. Aims 2 and 3 will evaluate the impact of the LUNDON score on donor management and organ acceptance using simulation-based experiments with OPO coordinators, OPO clinical leadership, transplant pulmonologists, and transplant surgeons (n = 120 total). Aim 4 will synthesize findings to develop and pilot implementation toolkits across three OPOs and three transplant centers. Two implementation frameworks [the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)] will guide data collection and analysis, integrating quantitative and qualitative findings. EXPECTED IMPACT: Findings from this collaborative, nationally supported study involving partners from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the national lung transplant community will inform the development of toolkits to support LUNDON score adoption in clinical practice, with the goal of reducing variation in donor management and increasing donor lung utilization. Future studies will explore the effect of LUNDON score adoption on donor lung utilization and recipient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342383
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing the Lung Donor (LUNDON) acceptability score in U.S. donor management and transplant decision-making: A multi-aim, mixed-methods protocol

Nikki E. Rossetti, Christy Hamilton, Nahom Seyoum, Ana A. Baumann et al.
PLoS ONE
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Implementing the Lung Donor (LUNDON) acceptability score in U.S. donor management and transplant decision-making: A multi-aim, mixed-methods protocol

Nikki E. Rossetti, Christy Hamilton, Nahom Seyoum, Ana A. Baumann, Samantha Morrison, Christian Oncken, Yan Yan, Gary Marklin, Brendon Cummiskey, Sarah Peskoe, Zhizhou Yang, Arvind Kumar, Meghna Katta, Kyle Stumbaugh, Charles R. Liu, Su-Hsin Chang, Varun Puri, Matthew Hartwig, Brendan Heiden, Graham Jaensch-Frie, Nicholas Schroy
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in transplantation science, a persistent shortage of donor lungs continues to limit access to life-saving lung transplants. The Lung Donor (LUNDON) Acceptability Score is a validated tool that predicts donor lung utilization and post-transplant recipient outcomes, but integration into practice remains limited. This study will evaluate determinants of LUNDON score adoption, its impact on clinical decision-making, and develop tools to support its implementation. METHODS: This is a multi-aim mixed-methods pre-implementation study that will be conducted across U.S. Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) and lung transplant centers. Aim 1 will identify barriers and facilitators of LUNDON score adoption through surveys (n = 242 participants) and interviews (n = 60 participants) of OPO and transplant providers. Aims 2 and 3 will evaluate the impact of the LUNDON score on donor management and organ acceptance using simulation-based experiments with OPO coordinators, OPO clinical leadership, transplant pulmonologists, and transplant surgeons (n = 120 total). Aim 4 will synthesize findings to develop and pilot implementation toolkits across three OPOs and three transplant centers. Two implementation frameworks [the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)] will guide data collection and analysis, integrating quantitative and qualitative findings. EXPECTED IMPACT: Findings from this collaborative, nationally supported study involving partners from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the national lung transplant community will inform the development of toolkits to support LUNDON score adoption in clinical practice, with the goal of reducing variation in donor management and increasing donor lung utilization. Future studies will explore the effect of LUNDON score adoption on donor lung utilization and recipient outcomes.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(4)
Duke University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Government of the United States of America (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.