Bioleaching of heavy metals from soils contaminated by military activities using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans

• Cu, Ni, and Pb predominated in real soils impacted by military activities. • Higher bioleaching efficiency was observed in more acidic soils. • A. ferrooxidans achieved higher Ni release than HNO 3 extraction in acidic soils. • Metal solubilization declined after 24 h due to incorporation into jarosite phases. • Jarosite phases were confirmed by SEM and XRD analyses This study compares the bioleaching efficiency of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in real soils contaminated by military activities. Samples came from three sites with distinct histories: (i) debris from a 2014 munition storage explosion (MS), (ii) an infantry shooting range impact area (SR), and (iii) a grenade range throwing zone (GR). Bioleaching performance was benchmarked against nitric-acid extraction (HNO 3 ), and the total metal content was determined after soil mineralization. Copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), and lead (Pb) predominated. Cu and Pb mobilization were highest in SR, while Ni was most effectively mobilized in MS, reflecting site-specific contamination. Although MS is a Gleyic Luvisol and SR/GR are Modal Mesobasic Cambisols, soil type was not the primary driver. Soil acidity impacted outcomes: more acidic soils (SR) yielded higher solubilization, whereas the more alkaline GR showed limited leaching. Nickel exhibited a distinct temporal trend: while its dissolved concentration declined during extended bioleaching due to sequestration within secondary jarosite phases, the process nonetheless achieved an approximately fivefold higher solubilization efficiency compared to HNO 3 extraction. This suggests that bioleaching effectively circumvents the mineral passivation that limits HNO 3 efficacy in this specific soil matrix, even though late-stage Ni solubility is constrained by jarosite precipitation. Overall, bioleaching efficiency followed Cu ≥ Ni ≫ Pb. A. ferrooxidans -mediated bioleaching is a promising, environmentally friendly in-situ approach for removing Cu and Ni from acidic soils, including explosion sites and shooting ranges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2026.101180
Primary Topic
Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioleaching of heavy metals from soils contaminated by military activities using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans

Natálie Hanáková, Štěpán Vinter, Pavel Jeřábek, Martin Sedláček et al.
Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances
Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
article

Bioleaching of heavy metals from soils contaminated by military activities using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans

Natálie Hanáková, Štěpán Vinter, Pavel Jeřábek, Martin Sedláček, Marek Koutný
article en

Abstract

• Cu, Ni, and Pb predominated in real soils impacted by military activities. • Higher bioleaching efficiency was observed in more acidic soils. • A. ferrooxidans achieved higher Ni release than HNO 3 extraction in acidic soils. • Metal solubilization declined after 24 h due to incorporation into jarosite phases. • Jarosite phases were confirmed by SEM and XRD analyses This study compares the bioleaching efficiency of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in real soils contaminated by military activities. Samples came from three sites with distinct histories: (i) debris from a 2014 munition storage explosion (MS), (ii) an infantry shooting range impact area (SR), and (iii) a grenade range throwing zone (GR). Bioleaching performance was benchmarked against nitric-acid extraction (HNO 3 ), and the total metal content was determined after soil mineralization. Copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), and lead (Pb) predominated. Cu and Pb mobilization were highest in SR, while Ni was most effectively mobilized in MS, reflecting site-specific contamination. Although MS is a Gleyic Luvisol and SR/GR are Modal Mesobasic Cambisols, soil type was not the primary driver. Soil acidity impacted outcomes: more acidic soils (SR) yielded higher solubilization, whereas the more alkaline GR showed limited leaching. Nickel exhibited a distinct temporal trend: while its dissolved concentration declined during extended bioleaching due to sequestration within secondary jarosite phases, the process nonetheless achieved an approximately fivefold higher solubilization efficiency compared to HNO 3 extraction. This suggests that bioleaching effectively circumvents the mineral passivation that limits HNO 3 efficacy in this specific soil matrix, even though late-stage Ni solubility is constrained by jarosite precipitation. Overall, bioleaching efficiency followed Cu ≥ Ni ≫ Pb. A. ferrooxidans -mediated bioleaching is a promising, environmentally friendly in-situ approach for removing Cu and Ni from acidic soils, including explosion sites and shooting ranges.

Journal of Hazardous Materials AdvancesVol. 22
Tomas Bata University in Zlín (CZ), University of Defence (RS), University of Defence (CZ)
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy, Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně, Ministerstvo Obrany České Republiky
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.