3D printing for biosensors: from fabrication methods towards point-of-care testing devices

3D printing is reshaping the development of electrochemical biosensors by enabling design freedom, rapid prototyping, and low-cost fabrication, making it a strong candidate for point-of-care testing (POCT). Unlike existing reviews that emphasize printing methods, filament composition, or analytical applications, this work critically examines how the fabrication workflow influences biosensor performance, including biofunctionalization efficiency, signal transduction, and reproducibility. The role of surface activation/modification on biointerface stability is analyzed for enzymatic, non-enzymatic, immunosensing, and nucleic-acid-based 3D-printed sensors. Key bottlenecks, including filament heterogeneity, insufficient long-term studies, insufficient reproducibility statements, and scarce validation in real samples, are evaluated. By shifting the focus from analytical performance to biointerface features, this review identifies essential gaps hindering the transition of proof-of-concept to actual POCT devices. Finally, emerging strategies, including custom conductive filament approaches, reagent-free activation strategies, fully integrated 3D-printed electrochemical cells, and wearable architectures are discussed to guide future advancements in the field. • Critical review on 3D-printing fabrication protocols for point-of-care testing (POCT) devices. • We discuss how 3D-printing fabrication workflow affects main biosensors’ properties. • Special focus on enzymatic/non-enzymatic, nucleic-acid-based biosensors and immunosensors. • – Critical gaps on filament heterogeneity, long-term stability, reproducibility, real-world applications. • – Translation of proof-of-concept to actual POCT devices is discussed and perspectives stated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2026.118872
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D printing for biosensors: from fabrication methods towards point-of-care testing devices

Eduardo M. Richter, Rodrigo A.A. Muñoz, Thiago R.L.C. Paixão, Beatriz R. Martins et al.
TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

3D printing for biosensors: from fabrication methods towards point-of-care testing devices

Eduardo M. Richter, Rodrigo A.A. Muñoz, Thiago R.L.C. Paixão, Beatriz R. Martins, Ana C.M. Oliveira, Diele A.G. Araujo, William B. Veloso
article en

Abstract

3D printing is reshaping the development of electrochemical biosensors by enabling design freedom, rapid prototyping, and low-cost fabrication, making it a strong candidate for point-of-care testing (POCT). Unlike existing reviews that emphasize printing methods, filament composition, or analytical applications, this work critically examines how the fabrication workflow influences biosensor performance, including biofunctionalization efficiency, signal transduction, and reproducibility. The role of surface activation/modification on biointerface stability is analyzed for enzymatic, non-enzymatic, immunosensing, and nucleic-acid-based 3D-printed sensors. Key bottlenecks, including filament heterogeneity, insufficient long-term studies, insufficient reproducibility statements, and scarce validation in real samples, are evaluated. By shifting the focus from analytical performance to biointerface features, this review identifies essential gaps hindering the transition of proof-of-concept to actual POCT devices. Finally, emerging strategies, including custom conductive filament approaches, reagent-free activation strategies, fully integrated 3D-printed electrochemical cells, and wearable architectures are discussed to guide future advancements in the field. • Critical review on 3D-printing fabrication protocols for point-of-care testing (POCT) devices. • We discuss how 3D-printing fabrication workflow affects main biosensors’ properties. • Special focus on enzymatic/non-enzymatic, nucleic-acid-based biosensors and immunosensors. • – Critical gaps on filament heterogeneity, long-term stability, reproducibility, real-world applications. • – Translation of proof-of-concept to actual POCT devices is discussed and perspectives stated.

TrAC Trends in Analytical ChemistryVol. 201
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.