Distinct system-level computations underlie perceptual variation across the visual field

Human visual perception for basic dimensions varies with eccentricity and polar angle, influencing daily activities such as reading, searching, and scene perception. We investigated whether and how system-level computations that transform visual input into perception underlie these heterogeneities. Using the equivalent noise method and perceptual template model, we estimated gain, internal noise, and nonlinearity for orientation discrimination across eccentricity (fovea, parafovea, and perifovea) and around polar angle. Participants discriminated the orientation of Gabors embedded in dynamic white noise and showed the expected variations across eccentricity and around polar angle. Importantly, visual performance declined with eccentricity due to decreased gain and nonlinearity and increased internal noise. Observers with stronger eccentricity effects showed greater gain decrease. Only gain varied with polar angle-higher along the horizontal than vertical meridian, and higher at the lower than the upper vertical meridian-paralleling performance asymmetries. This dissociation aligns with known variations in neuronal count and tuning. By revealing distinct system-level computations underlying the eccentricity effect and polar angle asymmetries, our findings link perceptual heterogeneity across the visual field and neural architecture and provide insights into how the human brain encodes information under neural constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2533752123
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinct system-level computations underlie perceptual variation across the visual field

Shutian Xue, Qingyuan Chen, Antoine Barbot, Jared Abrams et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Distinct system-level computations underlie perceptual variation across the visual field

Shutian Xue, Qingyuan Chen, Antoine Barbot, Jared Abrams, Marisa Carrasco
article en

Abstract

Human visual perception for basic dimensions varies with eccentricity and polar angle, influencing daily activities such as reading, searching, and scene perception. We investigated whether and how system-level computations that transform visual input into perception underlie these heterogeneities. Using the equivalent noise method and perceptual template model, we estimated gain, internal noise, and nonlinearity for orientation discrimination across eccentricity (fovea, parafovea, and perifovea) and around polar angle. Participants discriminated the orientation of Gabors embedded in dynamic white noise and showed the expected variations across eccentricity and around polar angle. Importantly, visual performance declined with eccentricity due to decreased gain and nonlinearity and increased internal noise. Observers with stronger eccentricity effects showed greater gain decrease. Only gain varied with polar angle-higher along the horizontal than vertical meridian, and higher at the lower than the upper vertical meridian-paralleling performance asymmetries. This dissociation aligns with known variations in neuronal count and tuning. By revealing distinct system-level computations underlying the eccentricity effect and polar angle asymmetries, our findings link perceptual heterogeneity across the visual field and neural architecture and provide insights into how the human brain encodes information under neural constraints.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(17)
New York University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Eye Institute
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.