Challenges and Barriers in Implementing AI for Clinical Applications in Anatomic Pathology

The transformation of anatomic pathology from microscope-based practice to digital and computational workflows has created unprecedented opportunities for artificial intelligence (AI)-driven diagnostics. Whole slide imaging systems, digital cytology, and enterprise pathology platforms now enable large-scale image analysis, quantitative tissue characterization, and integration with molecular and clinical data. In parallel, advances in machine and deep learning, and generative models have produced AI systems capable of tumor detection, grading, prognostication, biomarker assessment, and molecular inference directly from routine histologic and cytologic slides. Despite this rapid progress, translation of AI from research environments into routine clinical anatomic pathology remains limited. Barriers include data heterogeneity and limited generalizability, challenges in validation and regulatory compliance, infrastructure and interoperability constraints, workflow integration difficulties, and concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and professional trust. This review synthesizes current evidence on digital pathology and AI applications across surgical pathology and cytopathology, examines the technical, organizational, and regulatory factors that impede clinical adoption, and outlines practical recommendations for developing clinically deployable AI systems. Addressing these challenges through robust digital infrastructure, representative data sets, rigorous validation, and coordinated governance will be essential for realizing the full clinical potential of AI in anatomic pathology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Anatomic Pathology
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pap.0000000000000537
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and Barriers in Implementing AI for Clinical Applications in Anatomic Pathology

Qiangqiang Gu, Anil V. Parwani, Nickolas G. Littlefield, Riyue Bao et al.
Advances in Anatomic Pathology
AI in cancer detection
article

Challenges and Barriers in Implementing AI for Clinical Applications in Anatomic Pathology

Qiangqiang Gu, Anil V. Parwani, Nickolas G. Littlefield, Riyue Bao, Xia Rong, Ehsan Ullah
article en

Abstract

The transformation of anatomic pathology from microscope-based practice to digital and computational workflows has created unprecedented opportunities for artificial intelligence (AI)-driven diagnostics. Whole slide imaging systems, digital cytology, and enterprise pathology platforms now enable large-scale image analysis, quantitative tissue characterization, and integration with molecular and clinical data. In parallel, advances in machine and deep learning, and generative models have produced AI systems capable of tumor detection, grading, prognostication, biomarker assessment, and molecular inference directly from routine histologic and cytologic slides. Despite this rapid progress, translation of AI from research environments into routine clinical anatomic pathology remains limited. Barriers include data heterogeneity and limited generalizability, challenges in validation and regulatory compliance, infrastructure and interoperability constraints, workflow integration difficulties, and concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and professional trust. This review synthesizes current evidence on digital pathology and AI applications across surgical pathology and cytopathology, examines the technical, organizational, and regulatory factors that impede clinical adoption, and outlines practical recommendations for developing clinically deployable AI systems. Addressing these challenges through robust digital infrastructure, representative data sets, rigorous validation, and coordinated governance will be essential for realizing the full clinical potential of AI in anatomic pathology.

Advances in Anatomic PathologyVol. 33(3)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Middlemore Hospital (NZ), Intelligent Systems Research (United States) (US), UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), The Ohio State University (US), New York University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.