Estimation of Cropwater Use Efficiency in Furrow Irrigation of Bushbean Crop Using Cropwat 8.0 Model

Efficient use of water in agriculture is becoming increasingly critical, particularly in semi-arid regions like Anantapuramu district. Anantapuramu district (14.6819° N latitude and 77.6006° E longitude), which covers a geographical area of 1.913 million hectares. The district has a semi-arid climate, with hot and dry conditions for most of the year. This study focuses on estimating crop water use efficiency (WUE) of bush bean under different irrigation methods using the CROPWAT 8.0 model in the semi-arid conditions of Anantapuramu district. The weather data used for CROPWAT 8.0 model was collected for Madakasira mandal of Anantapuramu district for the years 2011 to 2020. The crop water requirement for bush bean was determined. The results clearly shows the relationship between water use, crop yield, and water use efficiency (WUE) under different irrigation methods. Flood irrigation used the highest amount of water (328.9 mm) but resulted in a relatively low yield (1000 kg/ha) and the lowest water use efficiency (3.04 kg/ha-mm), indicating poor water management and significant losses. Full (100%) irrigation improved yield significantly (1281.25 kg/ha) with slightly reduced water use, resulting in higher efficiency (4.27 kg/ha-mm), making it suitable where water availability is not a constraint. Deficit irrigation reduced water use (231.5 mm) while maintaining a relatively high yield (1187.5 kg/ha), leading to improved efficiency (5.13 kg/ha-mm), thus providing a balance between water saving and productivity. Partial Root Zone Drying (PRD) irrigation used the least water (141.2 mm) while maintaining yield (1000 kg/ha) and achieving the highest water use efficiency (7.08 kg/ha-mm), making it the most efficient irrigation method. There is a modify backward relationship between facility use and facility use efficiency. PRD was the most efficient method, followed by deficit irrigation, while flood irrigation was the least efficient and unsuitable under water-scarce conditions. For sustainable nutrient management, PRD and deficit irrigation methods are advisable, especially in regions grappling irrigate limitations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Agriculture and Ecology
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56557/jogae/2026/v18i210511
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimation of Cropwater Use Efficiency in Furrow Irrigation of Bushbean Crop Using Cropwat 8.0 Model

R. Sailatha, A. Ashok Kumar, N. Ashokkumar, S. Mushkin Vali et al.
Journal of Global Agriculture and Ecology
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
article

Estimation of Cropwater Use Efficiency in Furrow Irrigation of Bushbean Crop Using Cropwat 8.0 Model

R. Sailatha, A. Ashok Kumar, N. Ashokkumar, S. Mushkin Vali, M. Mounika, V. Srinikethan
article en

Abstract

Efficient use of water in agriculture is becoming increasingly critical, particularly in semi-arid regions like Anantapuramu district. Anantapuramu district (14.6819° N latitude and 77.6006° E longitude), which covers a geographical area of 1.913 million hectares. The district has a semi-arid climate, with hot and dry conditions for most of the year. This study focuses on estimating crop water use efficiency (WUE) of bush bean under different irrigation methods using the CROPWAT 8.0 model in the semi-arid conditions of Anantapuramu district. The weather data used for CROPWAT 8.0 model was collected for Madakasira mandal of Anantapuramu district for the years 2011 to 2020. The crop water requirement for bush bean was determined. The results clearly shows the relationship between water use, crop yield, and water use efficiency (WUE) under different irrigation methods. Flood irrigation used the highest amount of water (328.9 mm) but resulted in a relatively low yield (1000 kg/ha) and the lowest water use efficiency (3.04 kg/ha-mm), indicating poor water management and significant losses. Full (100%) irrigation improved yield significantly (1281.25 kg/ha) with slightly reduced water use, resulting in higher efficiency (4.27 kg/ha-mm), making it suitable where water availability is not a constraint. Deficit irrigation reduced water use (231.5 mm) while maintaining a relatively high yield (1187.5 kg/ha), leading to improved efficiency (5.13 kg/ha-mm), thus providing a balance between water saving and productivity. Partial Root Zone Drying (PRD) irrigation used the least water (141.2 mm) while maintaining yield (1000 kg/ha) and achieving the highest water use efficiency (7.08 kg/ha-mm), making it the most efficient irrigation method. There is a modify backward relationship between facility use and facility use efficiency. PRD was the most efficient method, followed by deficit irrigation, while flood irrigation was the least efficient and unsuitable under water-scarce conditions. For sustainable nutrient management, PRD and deficit irrigation methods are advisable, especially in regions grappling irrigate limitations.

Journal of Global Agriculture and EcologyVol. 18(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.