Cost-per-responder analysis of TAR-200 versus other Food and Drug Administration-approved novel and generic treatments among patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin–unresponsive, high-risk, non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer with carcinoma in situ in

AIMS: (CIS) is aggressive and treatment options are suboptimal. TAR-200, a novel intravesical drug-releasing system, received United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval on 09/09/2025 for this population. An economic model compared the cost per responder for US patients with BCG-unresponsive HR-NMIBC with CIS treated with TAR-200 versus other FDA-approved treatments. METHODS: A 15-month cost-per-responder model was developed from a Medicare payer perspective (2025 USD). Patients treated with TAR-200 monotherapy were compared to those treated with pembrolizumab, nadofaragene firadenovec (NF), nogapendekin alfa inbakicept (NAI)+BCG (with/without reinduction), or valrubicin based on published clinical trial data. Model inputs included costs for initial/subsequent treatment, medical visits, and radical cystectomy (RC). Outcomes comprised the total cost per patient achieving and sustaining complete response (CR) for ≥12 months, based on overall CR rates and digitized Kaplan-Meier curves and swimmer plots for the 12-month duration of response. Patients experiencing non-response received subsequent treatment or underwent an RC. RESULTS: At 15 months, the proportion of patients achieving and sustaining CR for ≥12 months was 43.5% for TAR-200, 18.8% for pembrolizumab, 21.9% for NF, 26.8% for NAI+BCG (36.6% with reinduction), and 10.1% for valrubicin. The total cost per patient achieving and sustaining CR for ≥12 months was $1,892,569 for TAR-200, resulting in cost savings of $698,262 versus pembrolizumab, $406,840 versus NF, $832,346 versus NAI+BCG, and $1,541,999 versus valrubicin. Considering NAI+BCG reinduction, cost savings of $162,599 per patient achieving and sustaining CR for ≥12 months were observed for TAR-200 versus NAI+BCG. LIMITATIONS: Model inputs were based on trial publications, possibly limiting generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: TAR-200 demonstrated the highest proportion of patients achieving and sustaining CR for ≥12 months, yielding substantial cost savings per responder compared to other FDA-approved treatments for BCG-unresponsive HR-NMIBC with CIS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Economics
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2026.2651037
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-per-responder analysis of TAR-200 versus other Food and Drug Administration-approved novel and generic treatments among patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin–unresponsive, high-risk, non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer with carcinoma in situ in

Sang Cho, Kruti Joshi, Dominic Pilon, Beatrice Libchaber et al.
Journal of Medical Economics
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Cost-per-responder analysis of TAR-200 versus other Food and Drug Administration-approved novel and generic treatments among patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin–unresponsive, high-risk, non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer with carcinoma in situ in

Sang Cho, Kruti Joshi, Dominic Pilon, Beatrice Libchaber, Mukul Singhal, Laura Morrison, Francesca Lee, Urvi Desai, Gordon Wong, Kayleen Gwyn, Stephen Williams
article en

Abstract

AIMS: (CIS) is aggressive and treatment options are suboptimal. TAR-200, a novel intravesical drug-releasing system, received United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval on 09/09/2025 for this population. An economic model compared the cost per responder for US patients with BCG-unresponsive HR-NMIBC with CIS treated with TAR-200 versus other FDA-approved treatments. METHODS: A 15-month cost-per-responder model was developed from a Medicare payer perspective (2025 USD). Patients treated with TAR-200 monotherapy were compared to those treated with pembrolizumab, nadofaragene firadenovec (NF), nogapendekin alfa inbakicept (NAI)+BCG (with/without reinduction), or valrubicin based on published clinical trial data. Model inputs included costs for initial/subsequent treatment, medical visits, and radical cystectomy (RC). Outcomes comprised the total cost per patient achieving and sustaining complete response (CR) for ≥12 months, based on overall CR rates and digitized Kaplan-Meier curves and swimmer plots for the 12-month duration of response. Patients experiencing non-response received subsequent treatment or underwent an RC. RESULTS: At 15 months, the proportion of patients achieving and sustaining CR for ≥12 months was 43.5% for TAR-200, 18.8% for pembrolizumab, 21.9% for NF, 26.8% for NAI+BCG (36.6% with reinduction), and 10.1% for valrubicin. The total cost per patient achieving and sustaining CR for ≥12 months was $1,892,569 for TAR-200, resulting in cost savings of $698,262 versus pembrolizumab, $406,840 versus NF, $832,346 versus NAI+BCG, and $1,541,999 versus valrubicin. Considering NAI+BCG reinduction, cost savings of $162,599 per patient achieving and sustaining CR for ≥12 months were observed for TAR-200 versus NAI+BCG. LIMITATIONS: Model inputs were based on trial publications, possibly limiting generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: TAR-200 demonstrated the highest proportion of patients achieving and sustaining CR for ≥12 months, yielding substantial cost savings per responder compared to other FDA-approved treatments for BCG-unresponsive HR-NMIBC with CIS.

Journal of Medical EconomicsVol. 29(1)
Johnson & Johnson (Israel) (IL), Clear Lake Medical Foundation (US), University of Houston - Clear Lake (US), Analysis Group (United States) (US)
Johnson and Johnson
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.